There's a separate letter saying you have to measure with the smallest configuration that it can be fired from flat against a wall
There's a separate letter saying you have to measure with the smallest configuration that it can be fired from flat against a wall
My Feedback
Credit TFOGGER : Liberals only want things to be "fair and just" if it benefits them.
Credit Zundfolge: The left only supports two "rights"; Buggery and Infanticide.
Credit roberth: List of things Government does best; 1. Steal your money 2. Steal your time 3. Waste the money they stole from you. 4. Waste your time making you ask permission for things you have a natural right to own. "Anyone that thinks the communists won't turn off your power for being on COAR15 is a fucking moron."
I was wrong.
So upon further research that was a comment by an agent about the standard practice of measuring (according to one guy a who's likely retired by now) It was not in a letter but in reference to a letter.
So I looked more for clarification
https://www.atf.gov/firearms/docs/at...ter-2/download
Page 8 lists a specific example for a folding stock measuring and the aol includes the stock as they say if the folding stock is removed it would not meet the 26" minimum
Another specific example cited by many is the uzi equipped with a 16" barrel and a folding stock is sold commercially and has an aol of 24" folded and able to fire.
Hopefully that makes it clear and sorry for muddying the thread
Last edited by Wulf202; 07-08-2019 at 00:06.
"The only real difference between the men and the boys, is the number and size, and cost of their toys."
NRA Life, GOA Life, SAF Life, CSSA Life, NRA Certified Instructor Circuits' Feedback