Close
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 38
  1. #11
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    N.W. Denver
    Posts
    1,416

    Default

    So...in a city that is having speeding and crash problems the solution is to make the lanes smaller. Force cars closer together? Really? What an idiot.
    If you want peace, prepare for war.

  2. #12
    Zombie Slayer wctriumph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    N W of Fort Collins
    Posts
    6,184

    Default

    She wants more commu ... Democrats to move there.
    "If everyone is thinking alike, then somebody isn't thinking."
    George S. Patton

    "A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both."
    Dwight D. Eisenhower

    "Conformity is the jailer of freedom and the enemy of growth."
    John F. Kennedy

    ?A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment, and is designed for the special use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and lunatics.?
    George Fitch. c 1916.

  3. #13
    COAR SpecOps Team Leader theGinsue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Colo Spr
    Posts
    21,974
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    I'm a big fan of bike paths, just not in/on streets.
    Exactly.

    Quote Originally Posted by ray1970 View Post
    Those dicks are supposed to obey traffic rules. He looked at me like I was supposed to yield to him or something.
    THis is one of several of my greatest complaints about cyclists on the roads. They want their cake and to eat it too - all without contributing any fees to contribute to maintaining the roads they use - or having any insurance requirements to use those roads. It costs my ~$49/yr to license my small single axle utility trailer which gets used maybe 5x/yr. Since it's being pulled by an insured vehicle it doesn't require any extra insurance (yet). I say if someone is going to be on the roads they should pay the same "per axle" fee the rest of have to pay, and carry insurance for the accidents they definitely cause.

    What if these were pedestrians using the lanes? The powers that be would scream from the rooftops about how it isn't safe - yet it's considered safe for someone on a 30lb bicycle? And a pedestrian doesn't swerve quickly and without warning to avoid an obstacle in their path.

    Most all of what I need to be on the roads for requires an automobile as a bike just wouldn't cut it. My 19.7 mile commute to work in my car takes from 30 to 50 minutes, depending on traffic. That would more than double (probably triple or quadruple) were I to attempt it on a bike - and even then only in "good weather" with a forecast without the chance of heavy rain, hail or snow.

    People can't drive worth a crap, the city is using tax dollars which should be used to maintain the roads we have to put in bike lanes which reduce the overall capacity for automotive traffic, they're making the roads narrower (I noticed this was occurring and was told I was mistaken because their are federal rules for traffic lane widths), they are reducing the speed limits which bunches up more traffic - all of this would tell someone with just a little bit of common sense that these are the causes for the increasing accidents.

    If they want their precious bike paths so badly, I say they start requiring all new developments to include bike paths (for commuting purposes, not just the "stroll around the development biking) that are separated from automotive traffic.

    So, Kathleen Krager f'ed up the traffic and roads in Colo Spr for today and many years to come and then hightails it out to Monte Vista to retire? The fool should be made to live in the shit show she helped create.
    Ginsue - Admin
    Proud Infidel Since 1965

    "You can't spell genius without Ginsue." -Ray1970, Apr 2020

    Ginsue's Feedback

  4. #14
    Iceman sniper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    16,987

    Default

    I?ve said it before and I?ll say it again, bikes have no place on any road occupied by cars. Until they pay for a license plate, get a bicycle endorsement on their drivers license and have proper insurance they shouldn?t be there. And they should only be allowed after all that happens to ride on streets that they are capable of going up to the speed limit so as not to impede traffic constantly.
    The endorsement will make sure they know the laws
    The plates will create accountability and the ability for police to pull them over and ticket them toward their license should they not follow the laws
    The insurance will be there to protect motorists in case the bicyclist causes an accident.
    Just like it isn?t a right to drive a car, it isn?t a right to ride a bicycle on tax funded roads. You want to ride on them, then pay to do so like everybody else.

    And I think anyone is is riding their bike on the roads is a complete idiot anyways. look around how bad people drive, faces glued to their cell phones and you really think being in right little spandex outfits on a puny bicycle is a bright thing to do? Go buy yourself a peleton...
    Last edited by sniper7; 08-17-2019 at 07:13.
    All I have in this world is my balls and my word and I don't break em for no one.

    My Feedback

  5. #15
    BIG PaPa ray1970's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    18,799
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I wonder how many people are maimed or killed riding their bicycles on public roads every year?

    Wouldn?t the simple solution be to just ban bicycles all together?

    I mean if it would save just one life then wouldn?t it be worth it?

  6. #16
    Not a Dude ChickNorris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Denver/CoS
    Posts
    11,159

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ray1970 View Post
    I wonder how many people are maimed or killed riding their bicycles on public roads every year?

    Wouldn?t the simple solution be to just ban bicycles all together?

    I mean if it would save just one life then wouldn?t it be worth it?
    For the f*king win!
    My airstream has been stolen by dopers

  7. #17
    Grand Master Know It All BladesNBarrels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Lakewood, CO
    Posts
    3,649

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ChickNorris View Post
    For the f*king win!
    Agree!
    My mountain driving has become totally defensive for the suicide kings and queens that want to take up any lane there may be.
    Buying Randall Made Knives and Randall 1911 Pistols

    BladesNBarrels Feedback

  8. #18
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default

    On our vacation to Moab and driving around Garden of the Gods, I noticed signs that said cars had to give cyclists 3+ feet of space, on roads that were a single lane in either direction with a double solid line divider. In order to accommodate that, one would either have to go the speed (or lack thereof) of the bicyclist, or violate the center line. That's nuts.
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


  9. #19
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Why wouldn't you give a cyclist space? Crossing the solid yellow is only an issue if there is oncoming traffic. It's the same thing as passing a tractor.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  10. #20
    Self Conscious About His "LOAD" 00tec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Aggieland, TX
    Posts
    4,275

    Default


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •