*CONFIRMED SEE PAGE 7* Littleton PD Requesting online-uploads of video for firearms transactions

[battle_sight_zero]

Have not been on in while. However something I saw at a local gunshop has my hackles up. Apparently local law enforcement under the guise of Colorado Government is now requiring gunstores that have consignments to place q government provided camera that records audio and video of the person placing the firearm on consignment. I have been told pawn shops do this of pawned items but the law was changed to include gunstores. My issue is that Colorado Government is now providing a camera with and audio Jack. This data per the FFL is then sent to a 3rd party server contracted with the State of Colorado. Tried to post this on the recall Polis site but I guess this government overstep is ok with them.

[electronman1729]

Is this a Boulder thing?

[battle_sight_zero]

Yes you work at FFL. I guess you have not been visited yet. Do you do cosignments?

[battle_sight_zero]

Picture attached from local FFL. FFL well known to many will be closing because of this. They wish to stay off radar until store closing.

[00tec]

Which CRS is requiring this?

[.455_Hunter]

I guess I will ask Ross tomorrow at Gunsport- I have been frequenting them since I was a sophomore at Boulder High in the early 90's. My search of Boulder City ordnances yielded nothing about video/audio of firearm consignments.

[Irving]

Is this similar to the state provided cameras over at Blue Core? Do they still have those? I guess they told me that they were Lakewood PD cameras if I remember correctly. That was about 10 years ago now though.

[Bailey Guns]

If this is the case, I sure can't find anything on it. I doubt a local law/ordinance would fly with Colorado's preemption law. Color me skeptical.

[battle_sight_zero]

This happened last Thursday. I am not in a Boulder but in the south metro area. More information will come out soon as the FFL makes it announcement of closing. Cant blame them since consignments are their bread and butter. They dont feel this is right. You are correct Bailey however someone's up to no good. Picture is the explanation they were given. Nothing in the code covers cameras etc.

[00tec]

If the code doesn't support them requiring cameras, they cannot require cameras.