Post-Ban Lower Receivers

[Justin]

Hey dont bash cats man, I'm a cat guy myself. Cant stand when people bring their non service dogs to stores so im thinking I'll get a cat harness and leash for my big orange cat

I love cats!

Want to exchange recipes?

[Gman]

But an M-1 WAS an assault weapon .... 75-80 years ago. The soldiers assaulting Omaha and Juno Beaches utterly depended on it (well, it and the naval fire from 16-inch guns and aerial bombardments and ...).

It was a weapon of war built for the battlefield, but doesn't fit the criteria of either an "assault weapon" or "assault rifle".

...but I think you knew that.

[Will1776]

I doubt it as that lower is CADOJ compliant, even under the current restructuring CA did that went in to effect this year. But that list for a new, permenant ban would again cover every semi-auto they can think of. As well as leave the door open for "adjustments"

The new federal ban bill uses a one feature test and one feature is a pistol grip. They define a pistol grip as anything that can function as a grip. The textured portion of the SCR stock can function as a grip. Basically every semi auto unless specifically exempted like the Mini 14 would be banned due to this definition. Not enough people are talking about that small piece.