Bloomberg running for president.

[Zundfolge]

This election will come down to "Who is less hated" just like the last.

I'd argue that the majority of presidents have been elected under that very dynamic. Ecclesiastes 1:9 and all that.

[Great-Kazoo]

Just for the record: Mikey can choke on a whole bag of dicks, while pleasuring himself with a barrel cactus coated in Tabasco and Ebola sauce.

No 40 .oz soda to wash it down?

[Justin]

This election will come down to "Who is less hated" just like the last.

This is literally one of the dumbest things I've ever seen written on this site.

That you, personally, hate Trump has exactly zero bearing on the fact that he has record high popularity for a president at this point in his career (and despite the fact that the press happily jukes the stats on polls to undermine him.)

On top of that, if you even bothered to take a cursory look at video from his rallies, it's clear that he still manages to pack stadiums full of people, there are lines out the door, and even in the massive venues he's going to, they still have to turn people away.

[FoxtArt]

Goodness, I'm sure I've posted plenty of dumb things, you're probably way off the mark in calling that the dumbest

My posts are for people capable of critical thought; they are obviously not for zealots who point towards Washington five times a day to pray.

It takes me all of 2 seconds to show you're full of shit. (and mind you, Obama himself was highly controversal; many presidents enjoyed far higher approval than even he)

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...oval-6179.html

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...oval-1044.html

I think you mean Trump ranks somewhere near the bottom in disapproval at this point in the season. I don't "hate" Trump; I'm not blind. I voted for him out of necessity for SCOTUS. His chances of re-election are not good, no matter how much you might lick his ass, he is beyond polarizing. The only thing that drives enough voters to "trump" is quite literally, if they hate the D nominee enough for (whatever reason). Trump certainly has his zealots that will ride with him no matter what he does - just as many leaders before him have had, throughout the world - but those zealots do not win elections. The independents and to some extent, unmotivated democrats do. But, there's no hope in overcoming "faith" with "facts".

[Irving]

There is an important distinction between people that don't like Trump (Orange Man Bad!) and people who understand that Trump isn't any of the things his supporters make him out to be.

[O2HeN2]

Saw my first Bloomberg ad last night on TV.

O2

[Justin]

Goodness, I'm sure I've posted plenty of dumb things, you're probably way off the mark in calling that the dumbest

My posts are for people capable of critical thought; they are obviously not for zealots who point towards Washington five times a day to pray.

It takes me all of 2 seconds to show you're full of shit. (and mind you, Obama himself was highly controversal; many presidents enjoyed far higher approval than even he)

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...oval-6179.html

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...oval-1044.html

I think you mean Trump ranks somewhere near the bottom in disapproval at this point in the season. I don't "hate" Trump; I'm not blind. I voted for him out of necessity for SCOTUS. His chances of re-election are not good, no matter how much you might lick his ass, he is beyond polarizing. The only thing that drives enough voters to "trump" is quite literally, if they hate the D nominee enough for (whatever reason). Trump certainly has his zealots that will ride with him no matter what he does - just as many leaders before him have had, throughout the world - but those zealots do not win elections. The independents and to some extent, unmotivated democrats do. But, there's no hope in overcoming "faith" with "facts".

RCP is a mainstream news organization, and therefore completely, utterly, and shamelessly biased. Sorry. Most of the mainstream polling organizations were caught with their pants down and their hands in the stat-juking-jar in 2016, and there's no evidence they've gotten any better.

Again, if Trump were so hated, you wouldn't see him packing stadiums full of people.
If he were so hated, he wouldn't be pulling record support from the African American community.
Etc., etc.

The fact that you slavishly signal boost content from mainstream outlets shows you're incapable of critical thinking; faith, nor misguided ad hominem accusations of analingus don't play into it all.

[Gman]

Saw my first Bloomberg ad last night on TV.

O2

Same here. I fell asleep part way through.

[FoxtArt]

RCP is a mainstream news organization, and therefore completely, utterly, and shamelessly biased. Sorry. Most of the mainstream polling organizations were caught with their pants down and their hands in the stat-juking-jar in 2016, and there's no evidence they've gotten any better.

Again, if Trump were so hated, you wouldn't see him packing stadiums full of people.
If he were so hated, he wouldn't be pulling record support from the African American community.
Etc., etc.

The fact that you slavishly signal boost content from mainstream outlets shows you're incapable of critical thinking; faith, nor misguided ad hominem accusations of analingus don't play into it all.

RCP collects results from all polls, across all spectrums. They don't conduct any themselves, and they aren't "mainstream media". If you took your blinders off for even half a second, you'd see that fox news even shows a -15 spread (meaning 15% more people in their polls disapproved than approved). But, you're not an objective participant, you're a cult follower. If Trump Jim Jones'ed you, you'd drink it.

Let me guess, the earth is flat too? Some people have dissonance to such an extent they might as well call life "virtual reality". There is no contrary fact that can ever be accepted.

PS: A lot of people show up to certain mosques too. That doesn't mean more than 50% of the country is muslim.

"A lot of people showed up in one spot, he's winning, science bitch!" -- Jessie.

Before you try to accuse people of "ad hominem" attacks, you might want to google it and see some examples. But you might end up with hypocrisy.

[Great-Kazoo]

Goodness, I'm sure I've posted plenty of dumb things, you're probably way off the mark in calling that the dumbest

My posts are for people capable of critical thought; they are obviously not for zealots who point towards Washington five times a day to pray.

It takes me all of 2 seconds to show you're full of shit. (and mind you, Obama himself was highly controversal; many presidents enjoyed far higher approval than even he)

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...oval-6179.html

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...oval-1044.html

I think you mean Trump ranks somewhere near the bottom in disapproval at this point in the season. I don't "hate" Trump; I'm not blind. I voted for him out of necessity for SCOTUS. His chances of re-election are not good, no matter how much you might lick his ass, he is beyond polarizing. The only thing that drives enough voters to "trump" is quite literally, if they hate the D nominee enough for (whatever reason). Trump certainly has his zealots that will ride with him no matter what he does - just as many leaders before him have had, throughout the world - but those zealots do not win elections. The independents and to some extent, unmotivated democrats do. But, there's no hope in overcoming "faith" with "facts".

Well it is one of them.


I believe trump's a fucking moron. However he's not hillary, or any other leftist, with a give free shit away for votes.


Not sure where you get your polling data from however, he's pulling a 30+ % approval rating from POC's Closer to 35 depending on which data you look at

Coming from that pos USAT saying this. It has a legit value
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ll/1013212002/

From Aug, 2019
https://spectator.org/why-trumps-app...ng-minorities/