Close
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28
  1. #11
    Grand Master Know It All newracer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Timnath
    Posts
    4,582

    Default

    I saw somewhere that a sheriff and DA were questioning if they could legally seize firearms since it's a civil order and not criminal.

  2. #12
    Keyboard Operation Specialist FoxtArt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Montrose
    Posts
    2,732

    Default

    That was in the article sourcing from "Fremont County" which is hilarious. They've been in the news left and right for all sorts of corruption in the last year or two. The one deputy with all the murder evidence in his shed, and IIRC like two other pretty serious deputy-corruption issues. Pretty sure the S.O. had to resign or something over a big corruption case recently, forgot all the details. Probably more likely to get your firearms outright stolen from the LEO there than seized anyway

  3. #13
    Gong Shooter
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Centennial
    Posts
    498

    Default

    [QUOTE=newracer;2247913]13-14.5-104 3 A Petition must (b) IDENTIFY THE NUMBER, TYPES, AND LOCATIONS OF ANY FIREARMS THE PETITIONER BELIEVES TO BE IN THE RESPONDENT'S CURRENT OWNERSHIP, POSSESSION, CUSTODY, OR CONTROL;

    The way the reads, all the info that "must" be identified, can be made up: "petitioner *believes*". no burden of proof from the accuser. With this vaguely defined proof, how does a judge determine a person warrants a visit from LEO?

  4. #14
    Rebuilt from Salvage TFOGGER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    7,784

    Default

    My prediction: After the first time an attempt to serve such a warrant goes horribly wrong and the serving LEO is injured or killed, subsequent "Red Flag" service will be made by SWAT teams, probably under "No Knock" conditions. All of this despite no charges being filed, and no convictions being adjudicated.
    Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...

    Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
    ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?

  5. #15
    Carries A Danged Big Stick buffalobo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Hoyt
    Posts
    15,794

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFOGGER View Post
    My prediction: After the first time an attempt to serve such a warrant goes horribly wrong and the serving LEO is injured or killed, subsequent "Red Flag" service will be made by SWAT teams, probably under "No Knock" conditions. All of this despite no charges being filed, and no convictions being adjudicated.
    That is the goal.
    If you're unarmed, you are a victim


    Feedback

  6. #16
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by newracer View Post
    I saw somewhere that a sheriff and DA were questioning if they could legally seize firearms since it's a civil order and not criminal.
    I wonder if they can legally possess NFA items since it's a civil order, and also when the future decision is found in favor of the respondent, does the process for returning NFA items require ATF action?
    Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est

    Sane person with a better sight picture

  7. #17
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Cheyenne, WY
    Posts
    2,191

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by buffalobo View Post
    That is the goal.

    That^^^


    Communism

  8. #18
    Keyboard Operation Specialist FoxtArt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Montrose
    Posts
    2,732

    Default

    3,000 problems with these of a severe nature that shouldn't even pass a liberal court.

    a) Preponderance of the evidence standard for criminal wrongs handled in an ex-parte hearing which guarantees 99% issuance.
    b) Anonymous accusations triggering red-flags in an ex-parte nature
    c) No bonds to protect against innocents damages (required, btw, for civil seizures)
    d) No ramification of any kind for false reporting
    e) "suspect" has the obligation to pursue relief at their cost at a higher evidentiary burden, no right to an attorney
    f) Clear criminal punishment (immediate forfeiture of firearm rights + jail time for refusing to comply)
    g) No right to face your accuser or cross examine them in any kind (or even for them to be identified)

    And I could go on. But even David Koppel doesn't want to call this shit out for what it is, it's en vogue in our society to say "Well, we need SOMETHING". All the legal challenges are weak. And at the end of the day, our courts operate on a "well, we need something, so we'll keep it" concept instead of "This is clearly in violation of virtually all constitutional protections and therefore, is not the solution".

    Day by day, there is far less distinction between our courts, and those of China or North Korea.

  9. #19
    Turned on by Gender Symbols
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    779

    Default

    It's all fun and games, until you have a balanced budget.

    We have to stop Government. They are out of control. And the only way to stop them is to make them accountable. And the first step to making them accountable, is to ask them to balance the budget.

    -John
    Last edited by iego; 12-12-2019 at 19:23.

  10. #20
    The "Godfather" of COAR Great-Kazoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Washboard Alley, AZ.
    Posts
    48,074

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iego View Post
    It's all fun and games, until you have a balanced budget.

    We have to stop Government. They are out of control. And the only way to stop them is to make them accountable. And the first step to making them accountable, is to ask them to balance the budget.

    -John
    No the first step is to toss them out after 2 years if they haven't done shit for We The People. After that a monthly delivery of tar & feathers till they get back on track.
    The Great Kazoo's Feedback

    "when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •