Merry Kissmyass Nancy.....

[Gman]

There are several pending federal court cases concerning House subpoenas and Executive Privilege.
For instance: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...na/2696585001/
Some pundits have suggested that is the reason the House is delaying sending to the Senate. If the court rules that the witnesses must appear, they can then add more "evidence" to their case before the Senate.

Those cases are from the Executive pushing back. They didn't appear to be necessary for the impeachment vote in the House.

[davsel]

Those cases are from the Executive pushing back. They didn't appear to be necessary for the impeachment vote in the House.

Hmm
https://theconservativetreehouse.com...ment-evidence/

As we suspected, albeit against much criticism, House counsel Doug Letter has responded to the DC Appeals Court arguing the forced testimony of White House counsel Don McGahn is needed for evidence in impeachment trial. [Court pdf Avail Here]

This court filing today bolsters the unspoken background motive for delayed House Impeachment Managers. The House Judiciary Committee is using impeachment as support for their ongoing effort to gain: Don McGahn deposition, and Mueller grand jury material (6e). The goal is opposition research; impeachment is a tool to establish legal standing to obtain it. Everything else is chaff and countermeasures.