I actually support it just for sake of showing how stupid it is. The standards require (much as a TPRO) that everything in the ex-parte complaint be assumed true - without any notice or response from an opposing party - even if it sounds ridiculous and the judge himself doesn't personally believe it. There are also no real ramifications for doing it - save in this accord, since it's an LEO, the DA will probably pursue a perjury charge; but for Jo-Blow, anyone can lie and claim they are (whatever necessary to file) and even when you disprove that, they won't face consequences - if she did it anonymously I don't see how she would've even in these circumstances; but she didn't. Everyone file an anonymous ex-parte complaint on your local magistrate and judge in the adjoining county, and it'll get cleaned up quickly.
Pretty interesting abuse. From the little info in the article, it would appear that this lady is upset and wants to enact some sort of revenge on the officer, but does not otherwise care how her actions will effect the legitimacy of this law. There really can't be a more perfect case to illustrate the problems with this law.
The Great Kazoo's Feedback
"when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".
I don't see the problem. Everyone has been bitching about them potentially being abused. If they really do get abused, they are much more likely to be changed.
Until you are the one falsely red flagged.
someone needs to red flag those that passed the law....just to make a point.
Laws aren't "preventable" measures. IOW, more gun laws won't stop mass shootings.
Here's a newsstory that shows 3 pages of the ERPO petition.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xVN8g2KJwU
Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est
Sane person with a better sight picture