Some are more risk adverse than others. ITAROriginally Posted by BPTactical
Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums
Welcome to the Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums.
Welcome to the Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums.
Some are more risk adverse than others. ITAR
Lessons cost money. Good ones cost lots. -Tony Beets
Some are smart enough not to expose themselves to unnecessary risk. DDTC
And its averse, not adverse.
Last edited by BPTactical; 04-02-2020 at 19:15.
The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...
Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...
Sage advise
The Great Kazoo's Feedback
"when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".
What does "shall not be infringed" mean exactly?
I know, I know, whatever some liberal activist court says it is.
Last edited by Gman; 04-02-2020 at 11:43.
Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
-Me
I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
-Also Me
There is a difference between something being legal and being prudent in today's litigation society. I wouldn't advise a store to release a firearm without a completed check. I don't think this is a test of 2A commitment.
Sayonara
Agreed 100%. Most are not going to risk taking that step, I wouldn't.
This^^^.
In this circumstance a business decision(good one IMO) not a look out for your rights decision.
Most places try very hard to stay out of the news so are not going to turn over a pistol to an unknown without the CBI okaying the transfer.
Personally I think it should be mandatory. If their "insta check" system is broken it's their fault, not mine.
Last edited by Little Dutch; 04-02-2020 at 12:03.
Never complain; never explain.
My Feedback
"Some officials running for office, including former Gov. John Hickenlooper, have called on Congress to close this regulation.
Background checks save lives. The House of Representatives voted to close the Charleston Loophole last year—why won't the Senate act? https://t.co/xoNoRxaZUO
— John Hickenlooper (@Hickenlooper) March 31, 2020"
FFS, more lies.
To the OP, doubt you're going to find one willing to go that route with any unknown patron. Perhaps one that you have entrusted your business to already for some time and are well known to the proprietor, but it's their ass on the line regardless.
I think Bert also nailed it, since the dealer isn't receiving a "delayed" response. The real issue is, IMHO, the unconstitutional actions of CBI getting in the middle of the gun buyer and the NICS. If they want to prevent prohibited persons, which by their definition includes those with state and local level TRO and domestic abuse convictions, then do a better and accurate job of reporting and consolidating (and purging when cleared) that data to NICS and GTFO of the way.
My Feedback
Credit TFOGGER : Liberals only want things to be "fair and just" if it benefits them.
Credit Zundfolge: The left only supports two "rights"; Buggery and Infanticide.
Credit roberth: List of things Government does best; 1. Steal your money 2. Steal your time 3. Waste the money they stole from you. 4. Waste your time making you ask permission for things you have a natural right to own. "Anyone that thinks the communists won't turn off your power for being on COAR15 is a fucking moron."
If our overlords insist on using NICS, every citizen, not just ffls, should be able to use it for transferring of firearms between private parties.
No need for silly forms and tracking serial numbers.
Hell I would be for removing all serial numbers from guns. Government has no right to track goods purchased by its citizens.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote