Gonna be a mess - got an excuse to agitate

[Martinjmpr]

Good question. I think business ins underwriter or fire and casualty might know (member we know) might know better, but generally I think damage from riot is usually included. Those insurance companies who exclude stuff like this is just no go in my book.

"Acts of War" are generally excluded from insurance claims, but not civil unrest AFAIK.

I think the idea behind that is that in an 'act of war' it is generally a nation-state acting against the entire US, and there are likely to be many claims that could quickly bankrupt an insurance company. Furthermore, unlike fire or flood, there's really very little that any insured can do to mitigate damages from acts of war.

I don't know how many insurance claims were filed following the Sept 11th attacks but I'll bet it was in the tens or hundreds of thousands. Were they paid? I honestly don't know.

I do know that the US Government had (and AFAIK still has) an office where people who were harmed by the 9/11 attacks can submit claims and the US government pays them, but I don't know if, for example, they have to wait until they get a denial from their primary insurance before applying, or whether filing a US government claim precludes them from filing a claim with their insurance company.

I also don't know if the INSURANCE COMPANIES have the ability to file a claim for what amounts to indemnification in the event that they have to pay claims related to 9/11. It would be an interesting question but not germane to this topic, I think.

[eddiememphis]

Good question. I think business ins underwriter or fire and casualty might know (member we know) might know better, but generally I think damage from riot is usually included. Those insurance companies who exclude stuff like this is just no go in my book.

It's called VMM. Vandalism and Malicious Mischief.
Any decent agent will add it if it's not included.

[Gman]

It's called VMM. Vandalism and Malicious Mischief.
Any decent agent will add it if it's not included.

Good to know. Thank you.

[Gman]

[roberth]

Islam isn't a religion. A theocratic government system that is incompatible with our form of government. What planet are you from...

Islam is a religion, but it is also a totalitarian form of government that is wholly incompatible with The Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Islam has Allah like the Jews have Yahweh and the Christians have God and the Trinity. Islam has a single major prophet, the pedophile and murderer Mohammed. Christianity has many prophets and Jesus Christ the Savior. Islam advocates submission through violence and death, Christianity and Judaism advocate God's love and life itself.

[DavieD55]

From the Harvard Divinity School:



From the Encyclopedia Britannica:



From the Pew Research Center:



Headline from Foreign Policy (foreignpolicy.com):



From PBS.org:





You may be able to argue that Islam tends to advance a certain political belief. But to say it's not a religion? See my previous comment about saying stupid shit.

You can site all the libtard organizations you like and call it a religion. I'll call it a theocracy.

[Bailey Guns]

You can site all the libtard organizations you like and call it a religion. I'll call it a theocracy.

foreignpolicy.com is hardly liberal. Neither is the Pew Research Center. As a matter of fact, I choose those links exactly because they represent a more right viewpoint, a more left viewpoint and a non-political viewpoint. I guess I could've linked to a video from an organization founded by a disgraced former FBI agent who had sex with an informant on a very high profile criminal case, had several extra-marital affairs with female FBI agents and who resigned rather than face an FBI investigation.

You can call a pop tart a gun if you'd like. That doesn't make it so.

I still maintain you'd rather not be denied your rights based on your name or religion. I'm just glad the distribution of "rights" aren't up to people who think like you and John Guandolo.

[BushMasterBoy]

There is supposed to be a demonstration in downtown Pueblo near the El Pueblo History Museum tomorrow. So Saturday May 30th is probably a good day to avoid downtown Pueblo.

https://www.historycolorado.org/el-p...history-museum

Below is a quote copied from Facebook and I believe it is a reliable source.

"PUEBLO FAMILY
There will be a march/protest TOMORROW AT NOON❗
We will be meeting at El Pueblo History Museum and marching to the Pueblo Police Department.
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
BLACK LIVES MATTER
BROWN LIVES MATTER.
Our black relatives, our Chicano community, our Indigenous community ARE DYING AT THE HANDS OF THE POLICE and there is ZERO police accountability.
We are coming together, UNIDOS, to take a stand and let our voices heard - NO MORE KILLINGS OF OUR PEOPLE.
Police brutality is happening everywhere - including our town of Pueblo.
Join us to march in solidarity with one another!!!!
We will have elders and immune vulnerable amongst us so we ask out of respect to them, to wear masks and practice social distancing (6ft) as best as possible. Bring your signs!
#BLACKLIVESMATTER #BROWNLIVESMATTER"

[hollohas]

Riots are targeting the CNN headquarters in Atlanta. They've even pushed the police back into the building and started destroying the place. Isn't that ironic.

[BPTactical]

The odd thing I noticed on the 5-6 o'clock news- for a "Black Lives Matter" rally there were not that many black people apparant, maybe a 6-1 ratio.

You think all those white, virtue signaling millenials have any idea that they are the first course if the Beast truly gets hungry and bares its fangs?

Likely not methinks.







Stay frosty