
Originally Posted by
crays
He's just as bad as he says the others are. Would have been more convincing if his approach was a bit less condescending and if he had shown some of the construction that was actually using the same type of materials. So who's to say the materials were not merely re-located to a new undisclosed location? Haven't seen any of his reporting in a while, so I have no idea if he's still a straight-up, stand up guy, or yet another media shill for the left. It seems like years ago he was a pretty good reporter, but maybe my memory is just not great.