Another reason to avoid Denver Saturday

[BPTactical]

BGM guy, security guard, 9News producer and Helen Richardson conspired to provoke violent confrontations they could record to make patriots look bad and further their socialist agenda. That conspiracy resulted in murder.

Concur

[hollohas]

In other news the event attended by the deceased is linked to this organization. They have a "Pikes Peak" chapter and a rally scheduled at Bandimere. Might want to avoid any place this group gathers. Link below for your perusal.


https://fecunited.com/uadf/

That's Tig Tiegen's group. They also organized the first Patriot Rally where peeps (including Michelle Malkin) got assualted by BLM and Antifa earlier this summer downtown.

[BladesNBarrels]

Thanks for that! It led me to other good shorts.

Reminds me of O Henry short stories on video.
Thanks for the diversion.

[roberth]

Useful idiot commie trash charged with 2nd degree murder

https://kdvr.com/news/local/unlicens...he-2nd-degree/

Matthew Dolloff, the unlicensed security guard working with a 9NEWS reporting crew at a “Patriot Muster” in downtown Denver last week, will be charged with murder in the 2nd degree.

I thought McCann would figure out a way to let the useful idiot walk, guess the evidence was too overwhelming even for a sack-of-shit like her.

I hope 9mmNews, the FishWrap, the Pinkertons lose their shirts in the ensuing lawsuits.

[BushMasterBoy]

Still no word on the second gun...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...protester.html

[Gman]

Why is that important?

[BushMasterBoy]

The deceased was armed and menacing makes justifiable homicide. Case dismissed.

[FoxtArt]

That's not how it works. Lawful use of deadly physical force requires a justifiable belief of imminent serious bodily injury. It is entirely subjective and what a jury would believe.

It does not require that the other person, possess on their body, a weapon of some kind nor is that relevant.

Where it becomes important here is the fat that the slapper was backing up. The shooter reacted out of anger, not a justifiable belief of imminent serious bodily injury.

However, statistically a jury will let him off on political lines, as a few members are likely to be hardcore socialists themselves, whose opinion won't be legal or factual, but simply "that racist deserved to die".

[BushMasterBoy]

If a guy with a gun hits you in the face, then maces you, what do you expect is next? Has nothing to do with politics.
The problem I see is that big corporations are possibly liable here. Big corporations have big law firms. Large sums of money are involved. They have a vested interest in the defendant being found not guilty. Reduces civil liability.

"The law is based on experience, not logic."

[FoxtArt]

The mace didn't occur until after the shooter had already drawn, pointed, and most likely fired a weapon at the deceased.

If the deceased was shot as he was slapping the shooter, it could be arguable that there was a belief of imminent serious bodily injury, because there are extreme examples of people having been seriously injured.

If the deceased was shot after having already slapped the shooter, and backed away, it is no longer arguable. There was no longer a justifiable belief of imminent serious bodily injury, only rage for having been bitch slapped.

Read the pertinent statutes and some case law, the courts do not function on personal opinion. The affirmative defenses of "self-defense" do not have imaginative burdens nor is "who hit who first" in any way relevant. Nor is "corporations" relevant.

And politics is most definitely relevant to todays jury in these cases. You need a consensus to return a verdict of guilt no matter what the law is. With 25%-30% of our citizens of the opinion that "the other guys deserve to die", it is more difficult to obtain a consensus in political cases such as these.