https://www.popularmechanics.com/mil...ck-battleship/
This is pretty cool if they can make it work.
"The U.S. Army is working on a new, long-range cannon it claims can reach out and strike targets at up to 1,150 miles."
https://www.popularmechanics.com/mil...ck-battleship/
This is pretty cool if they can make it work.
"The U.S. Army is working on a new, long-range cannon it claims can reach out and strike targets at up to 1,150 miles."
Feedback: https://www.ar-15.co/threads/151613-izzy
Why didn't you buy me that cannon? Geez...
It'd be pretty tough to find a range to stretch that out on.
Feedback: https://www.ar-15.co/threads/151613-izzy
I bet those things are a good way to meet the state governor.
"Sir, we got 50,000 complaint calls this morning..."
Last edited by battlemidget; 10-17-2020 at 08:11.
I'll bet the reloads are pricey.....
That type of weapon doesn't make a lot of sense. At those ranges, the projectile needs guidance to compensate for the various conditions.
In fact, for that range I would think the projectile would almost have to go high enough to approach the lower limits of space. Why not use a missile?
Maybe they could use it like the M712 Copperhead, 'cept bigger?
Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
-Me
I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
-Also Me
I had thought that they had artillery rounds that were “guided” somewhat
Maybe it’s an adaptation of that
Offering complete Heating, A/C, refrigeration installation and service in the Northern Colorado area.
http://windsorheatingandair.com/
https://www.ar-15.co/threads/20783-F...nd-replacement
I've read about 'intelligent' munitions before, but you might be on to something. If the projectile could deploy wings or some other aerodynamic articulation with a guidance system to keep it aloft for a long time......
If the projectile were traveling mach-2, about 1400mph, it would take ~45 minutes to reach it's destination.