Goes to show that no matter what you learn, there will always be a "newer" math. I actually learned what Tom presents as new math. It took me a second to understand what he presented as the classic method, which really isn't different, just annotated in reverse order. I cant remember ever seeing how my Pops would have done such a problem, I think he just converted his habits to the methods I learned, but I just don't know for sure. What is being taught as new math now is quite revised, typically graphical, yet still retains the idea that it is more important to understand what you are doing that getting the right answer.






Reply With Quote
