Maybe old news but new to me, thought ide share

[iamhunter]

No, I would believe it. Its a real article on Reuters. There is no telling what is going to happen with all these international treaties that have been floating around.

Why anyone would even begin to think some "international treaty" can violate a consitutionally preserved right is beyond me.

It's nothing but smoke and mirrors guys. The only reason they even TALK about stuff like this is because we've been brainwashed into thinking that it is somehow within their power to sign away the constitution.

News Flash: It's not.

[whitewalrus]

Why anyone would even begin to think some "international treaty" can violate a consitutionally preserved right is beyond me.

It's nothing but smoke and mirrors guys. The only reason they even TALK about stuff like this is because we've been brainwashed into thinking that it is somehow within their power to sign away the constitution.

News Flash: It's not.

Look at how they have already gone against it. Look at how many sections they have "redefined" to suit their needs or completely ignored. It takes the people to keep them in check.

Believe me that they aren't taking mine, but I wouldn't put it beyond them to pass laws based on the treaty.

[iamhunter]

Look at how they have already gone against it. Look at how many sections they have "redefined" to suit their needs or completely ignored. It takes the people to keep them in check.

Believe me that they aren't taking mine, but I wouldn't put it beyond them to pass laws based on the treaty.

Yah well they're not getting mine either. So theres atleast two.

All it takes is people with a will.