Maybe old news but new to me, thought ide share

[whitewalrus]

Why anyone would even begin to think some "international treaty" can violate a consitutionally preserved right is beyond me.

It's nothing but smoke and mirrors guys. The only reason they even TALK about stuff like this is because we've been brainwashed into thinking that it is somehow within their power to sign away the constitution.

News Flash: It's not.

Look at how they have already gone against it. Look at how many sections they have "redefined" to suit their needs or completely ignored. It takes the people to keep them in check.

Believe me that they aren't taking mine, but I wouldn't put it beyond them to pass laws based on the treaty.

[iamhunter]

Look at how they have already gone against it. Look at how many sections they have "redefined" to suit their needs or completely ignored. It takes the people to keep them in check.

Believe me that they aren't taking mine, but I wouldn't put it beyond them to pass laws based on the treaty.

Yah well they're not getting mine either. So theres atleast two.

All it takes is people with a will.

[Elhuero]

I think I'm missing a joke here.... it's not funny when you have to explain it though! lol.

long running joke... don't matter if they ban guns, I lost mine down the bottom of a deep lake in an unfortunate boating accident

[BigBear]

Ah ok, lol. Sry...

[ryanek9freak]

You try to take my guns, nevermind, I just realized I dont' have any. LOL

[Blubyue]

If you want "my" guns, You will take "my" ammo with them, in any way I decide to deliver it.

I dont doubt this one bit. our 2nd amendment is written to bleakly. Now there are loop holes for criminals, politics,government, everybody and everything can be bent unfortunatly.

Kinda makes you think a little though.

[theGinsue]

The only reason they even TALK about stuff like this is because we've been brainwashed into thinking that it is somehow within their power to sign away the constitution.
News Flash: It's not.

2nd Ammendment, Ammendments to the Constitution of the United States: ...shall not be infringed.

Basically, he can't and this is not a way around the 2nd Ammendment. It's BS.

I agree that this is nothing but hype and BS, BUT...
By what definition do we identify "infringed"? Has not the 2nd Amendment been limited, infringed and misinterpreted repeatedly - particularly over the last 50 years (more so in the last 17 years)? Haven't these rights been disregarded and brushed aside by politicians, the feds, some states/cities/District to some degree or another?

Lets not say that it can't be done as I feel that it already is occuring.

[bryjcom]

Those treaties are real and Obongo could sign them but in order for them to be "enforced" the Senate has to ratify them.

For example,Woodrow Wilson signed onto the League of Nations but the Senate refused to ratify it and the LON died.

[Great-Kazoo]

i don't care if they take my guns. i'll get one from my neighbor

[bryjcom]

i don't care if they take my guns. i'll get one from my neighbor

Maybe you can start "storing" them over here along with your ammo.

and when it does come you can say, "here officer. All I Have is this little SKS and .22. Please take them and leave me alone"

I have no problem arming my block