HR 127

[whitewalrus]

That misses the point. The REAL reason for the proposal of insurance (and the license ... and the psych eval) is to price us commoners out of our rights ... make it to where only rich leftist assholes like Steven Spielberg can keep their gun collections but you and I will be disarmed and ripe for the plunder.

Not only price out, but make the process so difficult that the average person won't bother. Look at the NFA, most won't bother and the process isn't all that bad, but at first it does seem like a lot of crap to navigate.

And there aren't many in psychology who cannot find something wrong with everyone. It is like cops with traffic violations, there's something they can get you on no matter how normal you are.

[Zundfolge]

And there aren't many in psychology who cannot find something wrong with everyone. It is like cops with traffic violations, there's something they can get you on no matter how normal you are.

If the Psych Eval doesn't get you, once you're in the system, the first time you post something even remotely spicy online (or not spicy at all) then you'll be red flagged (even if you live in a state without a red flag law).

FFS they're about to try Trump for inciting violence by saying "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capital Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard."

[Great-Kazoo]

I forgot to add there is a requirement for the registered gun owner to obtain insurance.
No definition of the type or coverage limits- probably one of those things that needs to pass before we know the details.
However, it is another way to limit ownership since insurance companies can be coerced politically to either refuse to offer these policies or have the rate so expensive as to price out the average American.

"subsection a policy that insures the person against liability for losses and damages resulting from the use of any firearm by the person during the 1-year period that begins with the date the policy is issued."

You also forgot. Actually the democrats forgot. The same ins type companies that would insure you are.



The same one's NY , N.J and 1 or 2 other states kicked out and said they couldn't sell ins in their state. Or some other crazy democrat double speak.

[ChunkyMonkey]

Lobbyists have been busy collecting donation from local gun stores... It's going to get worse.

[roberth]

Ray for the win and those of you who register won't be able to sue for discrimination.

[wctriumph]

Register??

Register what??

[ray1970]

Register??

Register what??

Probably doesn?t apply to you.

It?s for the deer and duck hunters.

[colorider]

Damn boats. We own no guns

[battlemidget]

in a not-related-but-kinda comment, checkout predictit.org
I'm not sure how to explain it, but it's kinda interesting.

[D_F]

In some weird sick way, I hope this passes. I cannot fathom the compliance rate being high at all. Once that Pandora's box is open it may be interesting to see what else follows. In fact I'm somewhat tempted to start drafting letter to my representatives encouraging their support with the same argument.