Yes, I'm sure about that. 100%.
This is starting to enter the ridiculous phase, now, so I'll not play much longer.
I personally challenge you to find ANY case where the defendant really didn't know and was prosecuted.
If you want to be an idiot and take what I said out of context with your "Mary had a little Lamb" crap, then whatever. I will not play. Grow up.
And yes, it's excellent advice. From more than one attorney, from me being a Sheriff for a few years and actually being in court several times as an advisory witness. What first hand experience do you have?
Sure it's better to be safe than sorry. But you don't have to be a pantywaste. Your choice.
Marlin, as far as Columbine, you're comparing Apples to Oranges. Both that fellow and the "lady" had prior knowledge-and they bought them for UNDERAGE kids.
So that, too, is an irrelevant argument.
You may find one or two cases in the entire history of Colorado where someone has been indicted on such charges-but that is not the norm. And unless the fellow goes on a rampage, which is also not the norm, then not only would it be extremely hard to prosecute, it would not be worth the DA's time, money or effort.
Also, be realistic. If, in fact, this went to court-you're assuming one would tell the truth-pretty rare in court anyways, for cops as well as crooks.
So, let's see here. No bill of sale. No registration on said handgun. This fellows' word (who just killed several people) saying he bought the gun from you. There is no witness, no evidence, just his saying so. You, being a law-abiding citizen.
Yeah, right. Read the law. In most cases, his testimony wouldn't even be allowed in court. Your attorney would shred him. There's a thing called character when you get into these kinds of legal battles.
Again, simply silly.
If you abide by the law, do what is required, then you are safe.
The law is in place to protect the innocent and prosecute the guilty.




Reply With Quote
