Close
Page 13 of 19 FirstFirst ... 389101112131415161718 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 198

Thread: Citizen Strike?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Self Conscious About His "LOAD" 00tec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Aggieland, TX
    Posts
    4,275

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FoxtArt View Post
    Sounds like Billy just got hospitalized for a "non covid-19 infection". That's a lot of words for "the clap".

    ETA: Ah shit. Tell my kids I loved 'em.
    Confirmed as a urological infection.... LMAO

  2. #2
    COAR SpecOps Team Leader theGinsue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Colo Spr
    Posts
    22,029
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FoxtArt View Post
    Fill out and submit a medical exemption form pronto. At least it gives something to argue about.
    AFAIK the deadline to submit a medical exemption in your case could be as soon as October 25th. Just based off my gov dealings... So try to get something in before then, despite the illness
    Except, my government customer AND my company don't have a form to fill out yet. I spoke to a doctor today at the base where I get medical care and I'm getting a letter on their letterhead authorizing a medical deferral. I got my government POC involved today and after he ran things down for me he said I have to get my corporate leadership to contact my customers contracts person to work the issue for me. I'll be pursuing that on Monday. It appears that there is no official process identified yet for either medical or religious exemptions so each case will have to be handled/processed with a LOT of effort on a case-by-case basis. The trick will be getting my company and management to give a shit enough to put the effort out for me.

    Quote Originally Posted by hollohas View Post
    OSHA hasn't issued any regs yet. So as far as OSHA is concerned, there isn't a mandate yet that affects private businesses. My company is subject to OSHA (our mother ship covers 700 physical locations in the US). They are waiting to see what OSHA regs say and will comply, but won't do anything before it's made official by the feds.

    But I don't know what fed mandate there is for fed contractors. I've heard there really isn't one. Nothing on paper.

    Ginsue - I hope they accept your temporary medical deferral. There would be no reason to reject it, but so far it seems everything is happening without reason.
    Apparently the EO mandate says that any company doing business with the .fed must comply or their contracts will be suspended or cancelled - at least that's how my company (a BIG defense contractor) is taking it. My company had an unannounced telecon yesterday that only a few people heard about in time to listen in on. The company said how they are understanding the mandate is that ALL company employees (working at customer sites, at corporate sites and at home) must be vaccinated by December 8th or the company is not in compliance. So this is how my company is moving forward. Anyone not fully vax'd by Dec 8th will either be let go or put on a leave of absence without pay/benefits (company choice as to how they'll handle each employee).

    Quote Originally Posted by Great-Kazoo View Post
    EXACTLY MANDATES, THREATS, YOU NEED TO, ETC


    Yet NOT ONE piece of legislation, state or federal has been proposed, voted on, and signed in to law. Why is that. I've asked my state reps, still waiting for an answer.
    Probably no legislation because they know it isn't Constitutional and would be ruled as such by a federal court/SCOTUS review. That would knock the entire shit show in the dirt for the Biden administration so they're going to stick with just the EO and not rock the boat since the EO is meeting their goals.
    Ginsue - Admin
    Proud Infidel Since 1965

    "You can't spell genius without Ginsue." -Ray1970, Apr 2020

    Ginsue's Feedback

  3. #3
    COAR SpecOps Team Leader theGinsue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Colo Spr
    Posts
    22,029
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Any company that operates on a national level vice just within one state (i.e. Texas) in one form or another does business with the federal government, or at a minimum are regulated under federal interstate commerce rules. The .fed has already issued direction that any organization that does business with them WILL enforce the mandate lest they lose the ability to do business with the .fed and, I suspect, face federal penalties (such as loss of licenses and federal government approvals to operate). Fourteenth Amendment be damned.

    While states SHOULD be able to dictate things of this nature, the states are David and the .fed is Goliath -- only in this type of situation, Goliath has no chance of losing.
    Ginsue - Admin
    Proud Infidel Since 1965

    "You can't spell genius without Ginsue." -Ray1970, Apr 2020

    Ginsue's Feedback

  4. #4
    a cool, fancy title hollohas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    6,072

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by theGinsue View Post
    Any company that operates on a national level vice just within one state (i.e. Texas) in one form or another does business with the federal government, or at a minimum are regulated under federal interstate commerce rules. The .fed has already issued direction that any organization that does business with them WILL enforce the mandate lest they lose the ability to do business with the .fed and, I suspect, face federal penalties (such as loss of licenses and federal government approvals to operate). Fourteenth Amendment be damned.

    While states SHOULD be able to dictate things of this nature, the states are David and the .fed is Goliath -- only in this type of situation, Goliath has no chance of losing.
    The Feds have issued directions and threats, but have any actual regulations, rules, EO's or laws actually been issued that mandate vax? So far it just been "you need to do this" coming from the feds, but nothing official as far as I can tell. Seems like contractors are just obeying the threats even though there literally isn't a single legal document been issued by the feds that mandate vax for contractors. Right?

  5. #5
    Keyboard Operation Specialist FoxtArt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Montrose
    Posts
    2,826

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hollohas View Post
    The Feds have issued directions and threats, but have any actual regulations, rules, EO's or laws actually been issued that mandate vax? So far it just been "you need to do this" coming from the feds, but nothing official as far as I can tell. Seems like contractors are just obeying the threats even though there literally isn't a single legal document been issued by the feds that mandate vax for contractors. Right?
    There was the EO from the white house. AFAIK it set a firm November 22 deadline and purported to use OSHA as the arm. I have not seen any OSHA regulations yet, but also have not checked.

  6. #6
    a cool, fancy title hollohas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    6,072

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FoxtArt View Post
    There was the EO from the white house. AFAIK it set a firm November 22 deadline and purported to use OSHA as the arm. I have not seen any OSHA regulations yet, but also have not checked.
    OSHA hasn't issued any regs yet. So as far as OSHA is concerned, there isn't a mandate yet that affects private businesses. My company is subject to OSHA (our mother ship covers 700 physical locations in the US). They are waiting to see what OSHA regs say and will comply, but won't do anything before it's made official by the feds.

    But I don't know what fed mandate there is for fed contractors. I've heard there really isn't one. Nothing on paper.

    Ginsue - I hope they accept your temporary medical deferral. There would be no reason to reject it, but so far it seems everything is happening without reason.

  7. #7
    Machine Gunner clodhopper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Rural Weld County, Colorado
    Posts
    1,248

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FoxtArt View Post
    There was the EO from the white house. AFAIK it set a firm November 22 deadline and purported to use OSHA as the arm. I have not seen any OSHA regulations yet, but also have not checked.

    This is all I am aware of for OSHA at this point:

    https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/ets

    I havent read through it closely yet, but a perusal shows no jab mandate. It is just a requirement for a written safety plan to encompass the vaxxed and non-vaxxed. This is a continuation of the ETS from earlier this year, so it could change, but I suspect whatever comes will be similar to this.
    14 . Always carry a change of underwear.

  8. #8
    The "Godfather" of COAR Great-Kazoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Washboard Alley, AZ.
    Posts
    48,105

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hollohas View Post
    The Feds have issued directions and threats, but have any actual regulations, rules, EO's or laws actually been issued that mandate vax? So far it just been "you need to do this" coming from the feds, but nothing official as far as I can tell. Seems like contractors are just obeying the threats even though there literally isn't a single legal document been issued by the feds that mandate vax for contractors. Right?
    EXACTLY MANDATES, THREATS, YOU NEED TO, ETC


    Yet NOT ONE piece of legislation, state or federal has been proposed, voted on, and signed in to law. Why is that. I've asked my state reps, still waiting for an answer.
    The Great Kazoo's Feedback

    "when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".

  9. #9
    Keyboard Operation Specialist FoxtArt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Montrose
    Posts
    2,826

    Default

    Basically it boils down to the willingness to sucede or not. Is Texas going to over the EO? 99% not. So it's just not getting enforced.

    If it did, Feds would pull all funding, medicaid, etc., and it really boils down to the purse instead of the punisher. US Gov would be hard pressed to find active duty military willing to shoot at Texans, so that's simply not an option. But the purse is all powerful. If a state was brave enough to give the purse the finger, then things would start changing in this country.

    But... money is the root of something, something. Everyone loves their paycheck, including politicians.

    What is the biggest irony in our modern era is all it takes is a government to say "no" to court rulings, back it by enforcement, and the whole facade of our government comes crashing down.

    e.g. ---> https://www.oyez.org/cases/1850-1900/74us700

    Texas should just unilaterally legislate it and give the federal government the finger. Whadyagunnadoboutit? Once detached from the purse, the federal government has nothing left to threaten.

  10. #10
    Varmiteer Seamonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Kiowa
    Posts
    501

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FoxtArt View Post
    But... money is the root of something, something. Everyone loves their paycheck, including politicians.
    The LOVE of money is the root. Money is just a tool

    Quote Originally Posted by FoxtArt View Post
    What is the biggest irony in our modern era is all it takes is a government to say "no" to court rulings, back it by enforcement, and the whole facade of our government comes crashing down.

    e.g. ---> https://www.oyez.org/cases/1850-1900/74us700
    +1
    Everyone wants to be a frogman on Friday
    You can't beat a woman who shoots - RW Swainson

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •