Reading about defense wanting mistrial because of drone video quality.

"Regardless, the defense said that they have spoken with Rittenhouse and will be asking for a mistrial because they would have approached the trial differently if they had the higher-quality video."

Having not watched the trial, what is so critical about the drone video?



A different question. Can the judge wait for a verdict before declaring a mistrial?

As an example, the judge see "not guilty" and then just lets it stand and its over [well it never really over] but if he see a "guilty" can he say the prosecution was out of line and declare a mistrial? Or does he have to declare a mistrial before a verdict?