Close
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 40 of 40
  1. #31
    Grand Master Know It All eddiememphis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    3,132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hollohas View Post
    What jury? It never went to trial. The DA didn't charge him with the wrong crime, the DA isn't charging him AT ALL.
    He was formally charged with 2nd degree murder in October of 2020. The DA dropped the cases because, "We are not able to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt."

    My point is the burden of proof the State must provide in order to get a conviction is likely less for manslaughter than 2nd degree murder, although if the claim of self defense is enough to dismiss the high charge, it likely would be in the lesser as well.

    Which goes to my original post. Would the jury finding Rittenhouse not guilty due to self defense have an effect on this case? It looks to that it may have. The Denver DA looked at the outcome of that trial and may have concluded that this would turn out the same.

    That seems much more likely than a backroom conspiracy where they gathered and someone said, "He was working for the news, which is promoting a leftist agenda. Let's let him go, he did the right thing killing that racist, Trump loving hate monger."

  2. #32
    Fancy & Customized User Title .455_Hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Mountains West of Boulder
    Posts
    2,678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eddiememphis View Post
    He was formally charged with 2nd degree murder in October of 2020. The DA dropped the cases because, "We are not able to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt."

    My point is the burden of proof the State must provide in order to get a conviction is likely less for manslaughter than 2nd degree murder, although if the claim of self defense is enough to dismiss the high charge, it likely would be in the lesser as well.

    Which goes to my original post. Would the jury finding Rittenhouse not guilty due to self defense have an effect on this case? It looks to that it may have. The Denver DA looked at the outcome of that trial and may have concluded that this would turn out the same.

    That seems much more likely than a backroom conspiracy where they gathered and someone said, "He was working for the news, which is promoting a leftist agenda. Let's let him go, he did the right thing killing that racist, Trump loving hate monger."
    So you don't think "Unlicensed Fox News security guard kills local community activist at BLM protest" wouldn't have gotten more prosecutorial dedication?
    Last edited by .455_Hunter; 03-11-2022 at 18:10.
    The vagrants of Boulder welcome you...

  3. #33
    Grand Master Know It All eddiememphis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    3,132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by .455_Hunter View Post
    So you don't think "Unlicensed Fox News security guard kills local community activist at BLM protest" wouldn't have gotten move prosecutorial dedication?
    That's two different factors.

    Had you asked if he was working for Fox and killed the same guy, I'd say it is less of a factor than a lot of people want to believe it was.

    If he was still working for 9 and killed a community activist on the BLM or antifa side, I do think there would have been pressure or motivation to convict.

    However, lack of proof by the state to go to trial would still be lack of proof.

    Many people are outraged and would love to find a conspiracy at work. I'd like to see the fool in jail- he killed a guy, unjustly in my view. But so did Rittenhouse and he is held up as a 2nd amendment/self defense hero.

    While I don't like the outcome or especially the way the DA's office did it, it is the burden of the state to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt. If they can't do that, they shouldn't.

  4. #34
    High Power Shooter FromMyColdDeadHand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    808

    Default

    Kyle's shoots were text book. Maybe he shouldn't have been there in the first place, as in a bad idea, not illegally- but the shoots were cleaner than clean.

    This guy got shot for an open hand slap and then retreated- to which the shooter drew his weapon. It as only the editing of the pics that made it look like the shooter was shooting after the spray. The spray was in response to the pulling of the gun. Also, there are pics from behind the deceased, the shooter could have faced charges for that.

    That the Kyle case went to court AND he had to take the stand AND he had all the evidence on his side AND he was still almost convicted, versus this guy not even going to court? Put it in a grand jury, let them parse it out.


    Hey, if the net effect is that I can draw on a person after they bitch slap and retreat- I'm all for that. The DA in effect has lowered the bar for a self-defense shoot. This goes beyond a Stand-Your-Ground law.
    I'll stop buying black rifles when my wife stops buying black shoes.

  5. #35
    Machine Gunner RblDiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Longmont
    Posts
    2,130

    Default

    On the flip side, there's no statue of limitations on murder, so if a different prosecutor with balls gets in, he can still be charged later, no double jeopardy.

  6. #36
    Zombie Slayer Aloha_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    6,537

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eddiememphis View Post
    He was formally charged with 2nd degree murder in October of 2020. The DA dropped the cases because, "We are not able to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt."

    My point is the burden of proof the State must provide in order to get a conviction is likely less for manslaughter than 2nd degree murder, although if the claim of self defense is enough to dismiss the high charge, it likely would be in the lesser as well.

    Which goes to my original post. Would the jury finding Rittenhouse not guilty due to self defense have an effect on this case? It looks to that it may have. The Denver DA looked at the outcome of that trial and may have concluded that this would turn out the same.

    That seems much more likely than a backroom conspiracy where they gathered and someone said, "He was working for the news, which is promoting a leftist agenda. Let's let him go, he did the right thing killing that racist, Trump loving hate monger."

    I don't think so. This DA would have prosecuted Rittenhouse to fullest extent. IMO, she dropped the case because she never wanted to prosecute the guy anyway. He only shot a deplorable anyway, she probably would have preferred to give him an award.

  7. #37
    Moderator "Doctor" Grey TheGrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Lone Tree
    Posts
    5,750

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by clodhopper View Post
    I can understand the prosecutors point. I hope he still has to answer for being unlicensed, which is probably just a fine or something.
    Security guards require no licensing in Colorado.
    "There is nothing in the world so permanent as a temporary emergency." - Robert A Heinlein The Moon is a Harsh Mistress

    Feedback for TheGrey

  8. #38
    Zombie Slayer kidicarus13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    6,275

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheGrey View Post
    Security guards require no licensing in Colorado.
    I'm confused.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screenshot_20220316-030306_Chrome.jpg 
Views:	50 
Size:	58.4 KB 
ID:	89836
    Lessons cost money. Good ones cost lots. -Tony Beets

  9. #39
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,915

    Default

    To my knowledge although a license is not required by the state Denver, City & County of requires a license.
    Typical Denver.
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

  10. #40
    Machine Gunner Martinjmpr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Pueblo
    Posts
    2,108

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheGrey View Post
    Security guards require no licensing in Colorado.
    There are a smattering of local jurisdictions that require licenses. Denver is one. Greenwood Village used to require one as well. I think Boulder might require a license but I'm not sure. It's been a couple of decades since I worked security so I don't know what the rules are now but Denver has required private guards to be licensed since before I turned 21 (and that was a LONG time ago. )
    Martin

    If you love your freedom, thank a veteran. If you love to party, thank the Beastie Boys. They fought for that right.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •