
Originally Posted by
Grant H.
I call BS...
They aren't going down this path without the support and backing of Uncle Joey and the DOJ.
Is it legal, by the definition of the law? Nope, but much like your signature, if you don't want the ATF to make an example out of you, don't make a device that imitates FA and flaunt it...
RDIAS
Lightning Links
Bump stocks
Blah blah blah...
NONE of those fit the definition of a Firearm, and yet they are highly controlled or illegal as a "machine gun"... The courts have never once taken umbrage with that stance... Why would they start with this latest example?