Quote Originally Posted by KevDen2005 View Post
Almost every Safe2Tell I've handled is about a child threatening suicide. 99 percent of them are nothing since some other kid probably overheard the kid being checked on. It's merely a welfare check and no you aren't required to let LE inside. That being said, it always astounds me how everyone on this board thinks that cops are just out to get them all the time. Man, a cop is following up on some stupid Safe2Tell, that he doesn't want to be involved with anyway and wishes the system was never made. Now, instead of getting to all the other other BS paperwork he's accumulated all shift he has to spend an ungodly amount of time convincing you why this public safety matter should be taken care of now. Just think of how many times an active shooter happens and someone yells, "The police were warned and did nothing." All those cops have command staffs that remember that too so this officer gets to spend his evening investigating other options, talking to detectives about getting a warrant, all because "he's out to get you." Or you could just go with him inside and talk to your potential active shooter kid that you didn't realize was about to shoot up a school because you never go into his room and find out if he needs to be placed on a mental health hold or not.
I appreciate a view from the LEO side of things, and this is not intended to be a LE bash fest.

If you go the Safe2Tell website, there is ZERO information for individuals/parents on the receiving end of a report.

In the scenario illustrated in this thread, the son is not an active shooter threat, just a responsible and non-criminal shooting sports enthusiast, like the members of this forum, who happened to make a statement to his friend about going to the range.

What would be the depth of such a report investigation?