OK, what do I have to do to make everyone understand my previous post concerning the anti's saying all the time that our founding fathers could have never invisioned repeating firearms in this context is a METAPHOR. The Anti's say this all the time, and it's BS. That's the metaphor here.


The Denver inpoundment provision isn't really a good example. Almost anyone could see the potental for abuse with that piece of garbage.
What's the foreseeable threat with the Interpol EO? Giving foreigners Dip immunity? Dude, there are 100's currently running around in the Denver area and up in the shi resorts daily with that already. There are probably well over 10k in the USA with Dip immunity on any given day. We have about the same around the world with the same immunity in foreign countries. It's the price to have govt relationships. It there was no Dip Immunity, there would be a lot of countries with no US relations at all and vice versa.