Off topic, from the article:

"But in a lucky loophole for insects, mollusks, and other spineless creatures falling under the umbrella term "invertebrate," the act itself defines a "fish" as "a wild fish, mollusk, crustacean, invertebrate, amphibian, or part, spawn, or ovum of any of those animals."

"Or part, spawn, or ovum of any of those animals." They can extend protection to bumblebees under the guise of being fish, but don't see unborn babies as humans?