Close
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29
  1. #1
    Machine Gunner RblDiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Longmont
    Posts
    2,130

    Default The Twitter Files

    https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598822959866683394

    Short version, yup, tons of collusion between Twitter employees and government employees to censor information, though apparently more of a "Oops we made a mistake, let's keep going with it" than "Grand conspiracy" material. Also, senior execs managed to keep it from then-CEO Jack Dorsey.

  2. #2
    Machine Gunner Singlestack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Lafayette, Colorado
    Posts
    1,393

    Default

    Dorsey seemed to impress me early on as a bit clueless but not rabidly leftist like many. This seems to support that. The early disclosures were pretty much what we have known. Guessing by the lefty freakout there is more, and more damaging, revelations upcoming. I'm interested in seeing evidence of 1st amendment censorship collusion with DNC and the white house. The smoke hints at it strongly.
    "Guilty of collusion"

  3. #3
    Zombie Slayer Aloha_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    6,537

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RblDiver View Post
    https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598822959866683394

    Short version, yup, tons of collusion between Twitter employees and government employees to censor information, though apparently more of a "Oops we made a mistake, let's keep going with it" than "Grand conspiracy" material. Also, senior execs managed to keep it from then-CEO Jack Dorsey.
    Not quite.

    The decision was made at the highest levels of the company, but without the knowledge of CEO Jack Dorsey, with former head of legal, policy and trust Vijaya Gadde playing a key role.
    “They just freelanced it,” is how one former employee characterized the decision. “Hacking was the excuse, but within a few hours, pretty much everyone realized that wasn’t going to hold. But no one had the guts to reverse it.”
    That sounds very much like an intentional act by Gadde and others, not "oops, we made a mistake". Gadde's history has shown she is an ideologue and partisan so this isn't any surprise and as Chief Legal Officer, none of the peons below were willing to try to reverse her.

    Jim Baker, who advised to "stay the course", was also an ardent partisan and anti-Trumper so I'm not inclined to give him the benefit of doubt in making an honest mistake. It looks more like using the appearance of caution to cover for a blatantly partisan impulse. Add the collusion with Democrat lawmakers who wanted more "moderation" and it looks more and more like conspiracy to keep information on the Bidens' foreign dealings out of the news until after the election.

  4. #4
    Machine Gunner RblDiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Longmont
    Posts
    2,130

    Default

    The latest: Twitter attorney Jim Baker was "exited" from the company. Looks like he may have been trying to censor some of the files being released, omitting references to his former FBI employers.
    https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/...YPLxV1_y_AFYnA

    https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1...ulRbL72WkrgTdw

  5. #5
    Zombie Slayer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Pueblo
    Posts
    6,931

    Default Bitter about Twitter?

    Sounds like the X-Files, eventually they get solved. Usually a tale of who is doing who, in the zoo! It would be really fun to own a rocket firm, an ISP and a social media outlet. Am I being too cryptic?
    Per Ardua ad Astra

  6. #6
    Zombie Slayer Aloha_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    6,537

    Default

    I'd say more obtuse than cryptic but whatever floats your boat ...

  7. #7
    Machine Gunner Singlestack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Lafayette, Colorado
    Posts
    1,393

    Default

    For those that have been paying attention, the twitter files are really nothing more so far than providing receipts for what we already knew had to be happening. I'm interested in new dumps showing evidence of collusion/collaboration between FBI-Twitter. White House-Twitter, and other social media-Twitter (Facebook, google, Youtube, Instagram, etc). This has all kinds of angles, from 1st degree gov violation of 1st amendment, election interference, antitrust violations, corruption, tax-exempt activity, and section 290 violations.

    The hard part about this is even if the house makes criminal referrals to the (in)justice dept, it will take a new prez in 2024 to install a new AG & justice dept to actually do anything about it.
    "Guilty of collusion"

  8. #8
    Machine Gunner RblDiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Longmont
    Posts
    2,130

    Default

    The Removal of Donald Trump, Part One: Oct 2020-Jan 6th
    https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1601352083617505281

  9. #9
    Serial Speed Limit Breaker
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    1,200

    Default

    Reddit, out right banned, the_donald, never looked back.

    First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
    Because I was not a socialist.

    Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
    Because I was not a trade unionist.

    Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
    Because I was not a Jew.

    Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.


    -John

  10. #10
    Machine Gunner RblDiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Longmont
    Posts
    2,130

    Default

    Part 4, the removal of Trump
    https://twitter.com/ShellenbergerMD/...20455005511680

    (And since I forgot to post it, Part 2, Secret Blacklists)
    https://twitter.com/bariweiss/status...07575633305600

    Apparently only _one_ person, who was low level, had serious concerns:
    https://twitter.com/ShellenbergerMD/...38099062558720
    "This might be an unpopular opinion but one off ad hoc decisions like this that don't appear rooted in policy are imho a slippery slope and reflect an alternatively equally dictatorial problem. This now appears to be a fiat by an online platform CEO with a global presence that can gatekeep speech for the entire world - which seems unsustainable."
    Last edited by RblDiver; 12-11-2022 at 02:16.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •