DOJ release pistol stabilizing brace rules

[hollohas]

"(iv) Whether the surface area that allows the weapon to be fired from the shoulder is created by a buffer tube, receiver extension, or any other accessory, component, or other rearward attachment that is necessary for the cycle of operations;"

^This reads that ALL standard AR pistols have been made to be fired from the shoulder, brace, stock or not. Because technically a buffer tube has plenty of surface area to shoulder it.

[eddiememphis]

https://youtu.be/aT-DH4Zx54k

What is the title of this video?

[eddiememphis]

The titles of the videos should give you a good idea as to the content. Some I agree with, some I don?t.

I am not certain what you are asking/stating/or implying.

Lastly, which video would you like my take on?

The links you post do not have titles.

I am saying there are a lot of fools making videos. Not everyone is an expert or has cogent arguments on the issues being discussed.

You do not give any take on any of the videos you post links to. That is why I was asking why you post them with zero descriptions.

You say some you agree with, some you don't. Why add a link without describing the video and what relevance it has to the issue at hand?

[hollohas]

I'm not a fan of video only posts either. Anywhere. If I follow a link about a topic I'm interested in reading more about and it sends me to a video with nothing more, I'm out.

I've read this entire thread and watched none of the videos.

Reading and writing are losing favor, that can't be good.

[Joe_K]

The links you post do not have titles.

I am saying there are a lot of fools making videos. Not everyone is an expert or has cogent arguments on the issues being discussed.

You do not give any take on any of the videos you post links to. That is why I was asking why you post them with zero descriptions.

You say some you agree with, some you don't. Why add a link without describing the video and what relevance it has to the issue at hand?

Lots of people making videos for sure.

I post things I believe others will find interesting. When there is a link for a picture in the Funny Pictures thread and some other threads here on the forum, there usually is not a description of what you are about to see, (the reason I seldom click on any photo links on this forum), if I need to put up the description I can easily do that.

When people post up a video with information and news or opinions presented in the video, I do not find that the poster making a statement or opinion on the content either way as being essential. Watch it, or dont, if you do choose to watch it, and inform or reform your own mind without someone you likely do not know telling you what they think about what someone you also don’t know thinks. Let the video stand or fall on its own.

[Joe_K]

What is the title of this video?

[brutal]

The links you post do not have titles.

I am saying there are a lot of fools making videos. Not everyone is an expert or has cogent arguments on the issues being discussed.

You do not give any take on any of the videos you post links to. That is why I was asking why you post them with zero descriptions.

You say some you agree with, some you don't. Why add a link without describing the video and what relevance it has to the issue at hand?

Joe_K should be putting these in using the "insert video" button in the post editor so it shows the preview.

[Joe_K]

Joe_K should be putting these in using the "insert video" button in the post editor so it shows the preview.

Nice! Did not know how to do that, thanks!

[bellavite1]

Any update on this bullshit?

[WETWRKS]

Any update on this bullshit?

A bunch of lawsuits are in the works with attempts to put it on hold till they get resolved. No decisions either way yet on any of it. One lawsuit does have more than 25 of the states attorney generals signed on fighting against the ATF. Particularly sounds promising when more than half the states say the ATF is wrong.