We've possibly been shooting down tiny, inexpensive hobby balloons that cost <$100.
$400k missile, meet $15 balloon.
https://aviationweek.com/defense-spa...shot-down-usaf
A small, globe-trotting balloon declared “missing in action” by an Illinois-based hobbyist club on Feb. 15 has emerged as a candidate to explain one of the three mystery objects shot down by four heat-seeking missiles launched by U.S. Air Force fighters since Feb. 10.
The club—the Northern Illinois Bottlecap Balloon Brigade (NIBBB)—is not pointing fingers yet.
But the circumstantial evidence is at least intriguing. The club’s silver-coated, party-style, “pico balloon” reported its last position on Feb. 10 at 38,910 ft. off the west coast of Alaska, and a popular forecasting tool—the HYSPLIT model provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)—projected the cylindrically shaped object would be floating high over the central part of the Yukon Territory on Feb. 11. That is the same day a Lockheed Martin F-22 shot down an unidentified object of a similar description and altitude in the same general area.
There are suspicions among other prominent members of the small, pico-ballooning enthusiasts’ community, which combines ham radio and high-altitude ballooning into a single, relatively affordable hobby.Launching high-altitude, circumnavigational pico balloons has emerged only within the past decade. Meadows and his son Lee discovered it was possible to calculate the amount of helium gas necessary to make a common latex balloon neutrally buoyant at altitudes above 43,000 ft. The balloons carry an 11-gram tracker on a tether, along with HF and VHF/UHF antennas to update their positions to ham radio receivers around the world. At any given moment, several dozen such balloons are aloft, with some circling the globe several times before they malfunction or fail for other reasons. The launch teams seldom recover their balloons.
So, a question for those who have real knowledge of mil aircraft capabilities. Instead of shooting stuff down, why not capture them? Pluck them out of the sky with a crane like arm and clamshell grabber on a high altitude aircraft. Maybe a 747 or jet propelled C130 like transport?
Wouldn't it have been better to capture the balloon or UFO craft without damaging it's contents?
Last edited by Hummer; 02-16-2023 at 18:21.
My T.P. wheeling and dealing feedback is here.
Opinions are like assholes, everybody has one, and it stinks more than mine.
Yo Homie, That my chainsaw ?
Pati, improbe et vince
I could zap it with high power RF energy using a ECM pod. Probably would fry the electronics. the problem then is that forensics could not analyze the circuitry after recovery. I work "Penetration Aids" & ECM on the Air Force side. Link below shows the system:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_countermeasure
Per Ardua ad Astra
I like this version from the John Wayne classic.
There's a lot more of us ugly mf'ers out here than there are of you pretty people!
- Frank Zappa
Scrotum Diem - bag the day!
It's all shits and giggles until someone giggles and shits.....
The first one in the news was anything but a tiny, inexpensive hobby balloons. However, the administration got so much (deserved) crap for letting that balloon transit the whole damned continent that they seem to be trigger happy now in an effort to prove they have cojones. This action has ironically proved the point made before: they wouldn't take any action at all against a known Chinese surveillance threat and violation of our national airspace until pressed but are happy to shoot down anyone else.