Close
Page 12 of 13 FirstFirst ... 278910111213 LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 123
  1. #111
    Machine Gunner RblDiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Longmont
    Posts
    2,130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BushMasterBoy View Post
    There was a show in the 1980's where an alien invasion was stopped by balloons. It was called "V". The best part of this clip is the last minute. Maybe China is believing this craziness...
    There was a (partial) remake of V about, oh, 10 years ago or so. I didn't realize that it WAS a remake. Had Morena Baccarin as the head alien.

  2. #112
    a cool, fancy title hollohas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    6,072

    Default

    We've possibly been shooting down tiny, inexpensive hobby balloons that cost <$100.

    $400k missile, meet $15 balloon.

    https://aviationweek.com/defense-spa...shot-down-usaf

    A small, globe-trotting balloon declared “missing in action” by an Illinois-based hobbyist club on Feb. 15 has emerged as a candidate to explain one of the three mystery objects shot down by four heat-seeking missiles launched by U.S. Air Force fighters since Feb. 10.

    The club—the Northern Illinois Bottlecap Balloon Brigade (NIBBB)—is not pointing fingers yet.

    But the circumstantial evidence is at least intriguing. The club’s silver-coated, party-style, “pico balloon” reported its last position on Feb. 10 at 38,910 ft. off the west coast of Alaska, and a popular forecasting tool—the HYSPLIT model provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)—projected the cylindrically shaped object would be floating high over the central part of the Yukon Territory on Feb. 11. That is the same day a Lockheed Martin F-22 shot down an unidentified object of a similar description and altitude in the same general area.

    There are suspicions among other prominent members of the small, pico-ballooning enthusiasts’ community, which combines ham radio and high-altitude ballooning into a single, relatively affordable hobby.
    Launching high-altitude, circumnavigational pico balloons has emerged only within the past decade. Meadows and his son Lee discovered it was possible to calculate the amount of helium gas necessary to make a common latex balloon neutrally buoyant at altitudes above 43,000 ft. The balloons carry an 11-gram tracker on a tether, along with HF and VHF/UHF antennas to update their positions to ham radio receivers around the world. At any given moment, several dozen such balloons are aloft, with some circling the globe several times before they malfunction or fail for other reasons. The launch teams seldom recover their balloons.

  3. #113
    Grand Master Know It All Hummer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    North of Ward in Subaru County
    Posts
    2,613

    Default

    So, a question for those who have real knowledge of mil aircraft capabilities. Instead of shooting stuff down, why not capture them? Pluck them out of the sky with a crane like arm and clamshell grabber on a high altitude aircraft. Maybe a 747 or jet propelled C130 like transport?

    Wouldn't it have been better to capture the balloon or UFO craft without damaging it's contents?
    Last edited by Hummer; 02-16-2023 at 18:21.

  4. #114
    BIG PaPa ray1970's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    18,799
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hummer View Post
    So, a question for those who have real knowledge of mil aircraft capabilities. Instead of shooting stuff down, why not capture them? Pluck them out of the sky with a crane like arm and clamshell grabber on a high altitude aircraft. Maybe a 747 or jet propelled C130 like transport?

    Wouldn't it have been better to capture the balloon or UFO craft without damaging it's contents?
    Well, where?s the fun in that?

  5. #115
    If I had a son he would look like....Ben SideShow Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    SE Aurora
    Posts
    7,121

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hummer View Post
    So, a question for those who have real knowledge of mil aircraft capabilities. Instead of shooting stuff down, why not capture them? Pluck them out of the sky with a crane like arm and clamshell grabber on a high altitude aircraft. Maybe a 747 or jet propelled C130 like transport?

    Wouldn't it have been better to capture the balloon or UFO craft without damaging it's contents?


    Something similar to a modified Fulton SkyHook ?

    My T.P. wheeling and dealing feedback is here.

    Opinions are like assholes, everybody has one, and it stinks more than mine.


    Yo Homie, That my chainsaw ?



    Pati, improbe et vince

  6. #116
    Zombie Slayer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Pueblo
    Posts
    6,973

    Default We Be Jammin'...

    Quote Originally Posted by Hummer View Post
    So, a question for those who have real knowledge of mil aircraft capabilities. Instead of shooting stuff down, why not capture them? Pluck them out of the sky with a crane like arm and clamshell grabber on a high altitude aircraft. Maybe a 747 or jet propelled C130 like transport?

    Wouldn't it have been better to capture the balloon or UFO craft without damaging it's contents?
    I could zap it with high power RF energy using a ECM pod. Probably would fry the electronics. the problem then is that forensics could not analyze the circuitry after recovery. I work "Penetration Aids" & ECM on the Air Force side. Link below shows the system:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_countermeasure
    Per Ardua ad Astra

  7. #117

    Default

    I like this version from the John Wayne classic.


  8. #118
    Witness Protection Reject rondog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Parker, CO
    Posts
    8,308
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Scanker19 View Post
    Maybe the black knight reproduced and is spreading spores!
    Quote Originally Posted by Hummer View Post
    So, a question for those who have real knowledge of mil aircraft capabilities. Instead of shooting stuff down, why not capture them? Pluck them out of the sky with a crane like arm and clamshell grabber on a high altitude aircraft. Maybe a 747 or jet propelled C130 like transport?

    Wouldn't it have been better to capture the balloon or UFO craft without damaging it's contents?
    Um, that first one was at like, 60,000 feet. Damn few planes can fly that high. And it supposedly had a payload the size of three school buses.
    There's a lot more of us ugly mf'ers out here than there are of you pretty people!

    - Frank Zappa

    Scrotum Diem - bag the day!

    It's all shits and giggles until someone giggles and shits.....

  9. #119
    Zombie Slayer Aloha_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    6,555

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hollohas View Post
    We've possibly been shooting down tiny, inexpensive hobby balloons that cost <$100.

    $400k missile, meet $15 balloon.

    https://aviationweek.com/defense-spa...shot-down-usaf
    The first one in the news was anything but a tiny, inexpensive hobby balloons. However, the administration got so much (deserved) crap for letting that balloon transit the whole damned continent that they seem to be trigger happy now in an effort to prove they have cojones. This action has ironically proved the point made before: they wouldn't take any action at all against a known Chinese surveillance threat and violation of our national airspace until pressed but are happy to shoot down anyone else.

  10. #120
    Grand Master Know It All
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Centennial
    Posts
    3,006

    Default


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •