I'm of the belief that even then they still wouldn't mind it unless, of course, it was their kid.
I'm going to have to disagree with you on this.
I think many of them know exactly what type of impact it will have and either don't care or want this impact. [NOTE: Listed responses are NOT how I feel but it's how many of those who want the wolves feel.]
- Decimating game populations? Good, then hunters can't murder these animals. It's "just nature" when the wolves do it.
- Harming outfitters and communities who rely on hunters for their revenue? Good, you're just accomplices in the murdering of these animals.
- Harming ranching? Good, you shouldn't be raising animals to just murder them anyway.
- Harming argiculture? Good, get your vegetables at the supermarket where they make them.
- Harm people or pets? Good, this is what they get for living in the wolves habitat.
- Harm mountain lions and other native predators? Oh well, small price to pay for bringing back these adorable cuddly wolves.
I had to double-check given the insanity that gets proposed here in the state.
Naw, we no longer have a republic, and barely even a democracy. The left got everyone calling it a democracy vice republic for so long that no one even understands the difference any more. From there it has been easy to run as a democracy that's quickly sliding into something far worse. All by plan.






Reply With Quote
