GUILTY!

[eddiememphis]

I think we can all agree the real victim in this is Trump's son Barron.

We can only hope that he doesn't, in a fit of rage, destroy Tokyo.

[FoxtArt]

I think we can all agree the real victim in this is Trump's son Barron.

We can only hope that he doesn't, in a fit of rage, destroy Tokyo.

Consensus reached. Popcorn is popped.

Less likely alternative: Maybe Melania will negotiate an even larger trust percentage. Barron is secretly behind the scenes, working as a double agent with Bloomberg to take down his dad so that he diverts all his assets to Melania, and by proxy, Barron, the evil genious of which isn't revealed until the final two minutes, blowing minds when Barron is revealed as the secret insider witness. Trump should've gone to his baseball game...

[arbol]

This would be funny, if it was not so serious.

Joe Biden, and the Biden Crime Family, promoting China, and the Ukraine.

Versus Trump, promoting the American worker, Energy Independence, and how to Make Americe Great Again!

[DDT951]

Easily defeated fallacy...

1st off, I've not seen any evidence of Trump having a conscience. The personality disorder he most likely suffers in fact makes that highly unlikely, biologically he unlikely to be capable of it due to defects, injuries, or under development in his cerebral cortex. That's what narcissism is, and sure, you can hide behind "he has not released any diagnosis" if you want, but that's a consensus among even most conservative experts. Seeing what he's done over the years with various contracts etc. is also demonstrative of that, he screws people over pretty much anytime he knows he can, you don't want to be a subcontractor, contractor, or attorney to Trump, you WILL get screwed.

2nd off, apply your logic to Putin. Putin was elected by a landslide, and has a voice, mission, and even more Russians agree with him. By your argument, Putin can neither be an asshole or a criminal, mostly because he is hated.... So, we can see why it's a fallacy.

I'm not asking you to hate DJT, I know you're a staunch supporter. However, arguing that he's committed no crime pretty much has flown out the window a long time ago. Again, there's no argument that he did bang porn stars among many affairs and bungled financial records for a payoff to cover for it.

As to what level of crime that should be, I'm not arguing that.

Argue that as a former president, he should be immune if you like, or that he's targeted (but again, he makes himself a target, and not because of mere politics). Arguing he's an innocent peaceful person with a conscience of all things... He's none of those.

Non disclosure agreements are not illegal.

As you are an attorney you KNOW that for a NDA to be enforceable to receiving party must receive consideration.

I have every employee of mine sign an NDA as part of a condition for employment. That said they must get some sort of consideration.

And you also know retainers are legal fees.

[Clint45]

I'm a bit confused about the specifics of this case, which admittedly I haven't followed very closely.

From my understanding (which may be in error, feel free to make corrections) is that Mister Trump did consensually fornicate with Miss Daniels about 2 decades ago. Apparently, years later, Miss Daniels did contact Mister Trump's attorney stating she would go to the tabloids and provide lurid details pertaining to the duration and overall performance of said event, as well as her overall dissatisfaction, unless she was immediately paid a large sum of money. I believe this type of scenario constitutes "blackmail" which is a crime.

Anyhow, apparently Mister Trump was accused of authorizing a transfer of funds to his attorney, Mister Cohen (a disbarred perjurer and convicted felon) who then had his accountant issue Miss Daniels a series of cheques totaling well over $100,000 to not disclose the details of her alleged experience as she had agreed. But now that Mister Trump is running for POTUS again, she violated the terms of her Non Disclosure Agreement and told the court all about Trump's tallywhacker and what she claims he did with it unto her person on a single occasion many years ago. Mister Trump responded that he never tallywhacked Miss Daniels as she claimed under oath. Then a jury decided to convict him of 36 counts of something done by Mister Cohen and his employees? It all seems rather Kafkaesque... a "spectacle," if you will.

Perhaps, if he actually did Miss Daniels, he should've paid her significantly more money, as that 100K probably went up her nose within 6 months.

And WHY was Miss Daniels not prosecuted for blackmail, which she seems to have admitted to? I mean, it's not like he prematurely ejaculated in someone he never met, in the changing room of a store he'd never been in, on an unknown time, date, and year, based solely on the spoken testimony of a clearly deranged "truthteller" who had several clear motives to confabulate. No, Stormy went to a famous billionaire's hotel room, of her own volition, and did her porn star act, then later demanded money not to tattle. She does not seem like a very nice person, nor an honest one.

[BPTactical]

So explain to me how he was indicted over 2 misdemeanor charges where the statute of limitations had expired…
Then explain to me how those two misdemeanor indictments where the statute of limitations had expired turned into 34 felony charges.
34 felony charges that nobody can specifically list.
Notice how none of the charges have been listed in detail?
Specificities is a real thing in a legal proceeding, the prosecution MUST specifically list in detail each charge.
But let’s get back to the two indictments on 2 expired misdemeanors.
Any legal proceeding pertaining to those is unlawful and unjust.
It’s similar to the “Fruit of the Poison Tree” doctrine. Any action taken under the ruse of the 2 indictments is unlawful and must be dismissed, often with prejudice.

This trial was not about law, it was about eviscerating a political opponent.
If this was about “law” then when are Bush, Obama, Holder, Jarrett, Clinton and the like going to be perp walked into the courtroom?
Anxiously waiting…….

[Delfuego]

So, if he is jailed, would secret service agents be in the jail with him 24/7? Armed or not?

They will officially drop his soap, ..............., then pick it up and show clear. Safety first.

[hurley842002]

Non disclosure agreements are not illegal.

As you are an attorney you KNOW that for a NDA to be enforceable to receiving party must receive consideration.

I have every employee of mine sign an NDA as part of a condition for employment. That said they must get some sort of consideration.

And you also know retainers are legal fees.

Is he an attorney or a psychologist? I can never tell from post to post.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Joe_K]

The irony is it only helps his campaign. DJT's two hacks are:
1) be an asshole.
2) portay self as prosecuted messiah.

In a round-about way it is exactly what he wants. Staged post-it note and all. Guarantee he wants a very short stint in jail (few hours) for the photo op and so he can claim to be crucified like Jesus.

Victimization is THE crutch of manipulation. The irony is the left played into his hand. They'd have had more success in defeating him by ignoring and laughing at him, making constant micropenis and tiny hand jokes. But then we'd potentially have an actual conservative president, and they dont want that either, I suppose.

The crazy thing is, people still think the left wants to defeat Trump. It?s the uni-party of Boaz and Jachin.

[TRnCO]

I certainly don't care much for Trump as a person and he certainly doesn't act "presidential", but I am sick and tired of having democratic/liberal policies shoved down my throat from every angle, from state to national. I will vote for anyone that vows to stop pushing higher taxes, open borders, DEI, anti 2a down my throat.