Quoting 10th COA logic:
However,
Pineda fails to prove that SB 23-169 implicates his right to “keep and bear”
arms, the third prong of step one. This is because SB 23-169 is
presumptively lawful as a law that imposes conditions or qualifications
upon the sale and purchase of arms and thus does not fall within the
protections of the plain text of the Second Amendment