Quote Originally Posted by .455_Hunter View Post
Lovely that the guy wants to throw the rights of 18-25 year olds into the trash.
He's also good with banning bump stocks. I don't own a bump stock nor any other device which can "increase the rate of fire" as I've never felt the need to have one and don't want to be careless with my ammo. Still, there are non-device techniques that can be employed to effectively perform the same function as a bump stock. So, then, banning bump stocks is just another feel good measure which does nothing potentially positive but puts restrictions on citizens enjoyment of their rights. Anyone who, when discussing firearms restrictions says "I don't agree with this part, but I'm okay with this other part" is no friend of the Second Amendment. Any restriction is an infringement and that is explicitly forbidden by the Constitution.