Upcoming legislative session..

[.455_Hunter]

So in summary it's a ban on any detachable magazine semiauto rifles?

[Oscar77]

So in summary it's a ban on any detachable magazine semiauto rifles?

This is headed towards the California style non-detachable magazines............ so as if the magazine is in place and can not be rapidly replaced with another................. The name escapes me at the moment.
That is what Sullivan wants.
".....If manufacturers and gun owners want to continue selling and using the weapons, Sullivan said, they would need to adjust to firearms that can only be loaded slowly, bullet by bullet, from the top of the weapon ? not through detachable magazines......."

So you can still sell AR's but the magazine can't be readily removed, basically have it pinned in place.

[kidicarus13]

This is headed towards the California style non-detachable magazines............ so as if the magazine is in place and can not be rapidly replaced with another................. The name escapes me at the moment.
That is what Sullivan wants.

So you can still sell AR's but the magazine can't be readily removed, basically have it pinned in place. [/COLOR]

Similiar to the NY SAFE Act in regards to non-detachable magazines. There are all kinds of gimmicks out there to try to speed up reloading, but hopefully we are not talking about those gimmicks come May.

https://youtu.be/Wz_rmunf6kU?si=TkQ2So04lO8Ol0X6

[Oscar77]

Similiar to the NY SAFE Act in regards to non-detachable magazines. There are all kinds of gimmicks out there to try to speed up reloading, but hopefully we are not talking about those gimmicks come May.

https://youtu.be/Wz_rmunf6kU?si=TkQ2So04lO8Ol0X6

Yes.......... That sort of true nonsense.

I HATE trying to apply logic and reason to these things.
I HATE EVEN MORE trying to decipher these legal issues thru a poorly written news article.

That said.............. maybe they are going to "grand father" this like the magazines.................. "..anyone who possessed the weapons before a ban went into effect could keep them....."
Which of course is funny because in this same article, they point out the failure of the magazine law to stop their sales.