Okay, who sent the plant to testify at 43:25?
https://www.youtube.com/live/EXi6RQu...NZtX0GcBxrIPy6
Okay, who sent the plant to testify at 43:25?
https://www.youtube.com/live/EXi6RQu...NZtX0GcBxrIPy6
Lessons cost money. Good ones cost lots. -Tony Beets
We all know, based off of previous experiences, regardless of any testimony against this resolution, the legislatures decision has already been made to pass this bill into law.
"Allowing" a public hearing, with statements from either side, is required by procedure, but ultimately is nothing more than theatrics to give the illusion of following mandatory democratic/legislative processes.
Ginsue - Admin
Proud Infidel Since 1965
"You can't spell genius without Ginsue." -Ray1970, Apr 2020
Ginsue's Feedback
KABUKI THEATER
In politics, "kabuki theater" refers to a highly stylized, choreographed performance where actors (politicians) go through familiar motions to create the appearance of conflict, drama, or negotiation, while the outcome is often predetermined. It signifies hollow political posturing, prioritizing theatrical showmanship and emotional appeals to constituents over substantive policy, often with a rigid, predictable structure
Key Aspects of "Kabuki Theater" in Politics:
Performance Over Substance: It is a derogatory term used to describe events, such as hearings or debates, that are seen as staged, scripted, and designed to look intense without accomplishing real change.
Pre-determined Outcomes: Often implies that opposing sides have already reached an agreement behind the scenes, making the public, dramatic dispute mere theater.
Political Posturing: Used to gain support, create an illusion of action, or "buy time" during negotiations.
Origin: The term is derived from traditional Japanese Kabuki theater, which is known for its exaggerated gestures, elaborate makeup, and dramatic, stylized movements.
The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...
Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...
OK, wow. I'm guessing Sullivan probably found that guy babbling somewhere and played him.
My Feedback
Credit TFOGGER : Liberals only want things to be "fair and just" if it benefits them.
Credit Zundfolge: The left only supports two "rights"; Buggery and Infanticide.
Credit roberth: List of things Government does best; 1. Steal your money 2. Steal your time 3. Waste the money they stole from you. 4. Waste your time making you ask permission for things you have a natural right to own. "Anyone that thinks the communists won't turn off your power for being on COAR15 is a fucking moron."
Wow, some of these clowns don't help the cause. 2:19:10
My Feedback
Credit TFOGGER : Liberals only want things to be "fair and just" if it benefits them.
Credit Zundfolge: The left only supports two "rights"; Buggery and Infanticide.
Credit roberth: List of things Government does best; 1. Steal your money 2. Steal your time 3. Waste the money they stole from you. 4. Waste your time making you ask permission for things you have a natural right to own. "Anyone that thinks the communists won't turn off your power for being on COAR15 is a fucking moron."
Passed out of committee 3-2, heads to Senate floor unknown date.
The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...
Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...
Way back with the mag ban and other bills the Dems insulted a rape victim who testified![]()
I am not smart enough to edit the "title"
?Ryan Parker?|?rparker@denverpost.com?| The Denver Post
PUBLISHED:?March 6, 2013 at 10:43 AM MST?| UPDATED:?June 23, 2016 at 1:10 PM MDT
As a bill banning concealed-carry guns on college campuses makes its way through the legislature, the debate whether students ? especially women ? have the right to arm themselves has become a hot topic of discussion.
The issue escalated Monday after state Sen. Evie Hudak, a Westminster Democrat, told Amanda Collins, a college rape victim who testified against the bill, that even if she were armed the night of her attack, odds are she would not have stopped her rapist.
Seeking clarification on figures used by Hudak to support her claim, The Denver Post discovered the statistics are not an equal comparison to the argument.
Hudak argued that Collins? assailant was so big that he overpowered her and rendered her self-defense training ineffective.
Will Rockies lose 90 games or fewer in 2026? | Mailbag, and other top stories from January 28, 2026.
Hudak also said, ?I just want to say that, actually statistics are not on your side even if you had a gun,? and cited data that ?for every one woman who used a handgun to kill someone in self-defense, 83 were murdered by them.?
But those figures apply to women with guns who are attacked by ?intimate acquaintances,? The Post found.
Lessons cost money. Good ones cost lots. -Tony Beets