Close
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26
  1. #11
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I'm pretty sure it was in the "The Largest Gang in America" video on youtube. It is basically an hour long video of the cops doing shitty things. I really makes your blood boil. I think the video got broken up into 6 ten minute sections, but here is the first one and I think where the scene I was talking about happened. I could only stomach a few minutes of the video though.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gH9k8L3oDa4
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  2. #12
    Grand Master Know It All clublights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    2,517

    Default

    I might be completely incorrect .........BUT......

    It was My Understanding that colorado law requires you to have ID with you at all times and you are required to show that ID at anytime an LEO asks for it

    Again I could be COMPLETELY wrong... but that is my understanding .

  3. #13
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I don't think that is necessarily true. Like if I go running, I don't carry my DL and too bad if anyone wants to see it because I left it at home.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  4. #14
    Rebuilt from Salvage TFOGGER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    7,789

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart View Post
    Also, I'm thinking that the police have the right to ask for ID though right? I mean, it doesn't matter if he was driving or not, because even though the officer asked for his driver's license, he wasn't asking to make sure he was legal to drive, but because it is the most common form of ID that people carry.
    Depends on what state you are in, laws vary. In some states, you are required to provide identification on request, alternately, they can "escort" you to the police station to establish your identity.....

    total bullshit in a supposedly free country, but reality in ours.

  5. #15
    Gong Shooter wyzardd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    303

    Default

    I read on one of those "know your rights" type places (so you know it's true) that you're required to "disclose your identity to police when officers have reasonable suspicion to believe criminal activity may be taking place"

    Lot of wiggle room there, in my opinion. How far does "disclose identity" go? Is "my name is ___" sufficient?
    What's "reasonable suspicion"? If the cop believes it's illegal to open carry, even when it's not, they could honestly say they had reasonable suspicion that a criminal activity was taking place.

    However, I couldn't make it past about 40 seconds of the video. Obnoxious snot with a camera and a cop that didn't like the idea of a subject recording him. But like I said, I didn't watch the whole thing
    A plan is just a list of things that don't happen.

    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  6. #16
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    You didn't miss much. I posted it before I had seen more than 40 seconds of it.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  7. #17
    Machine Gunner ronaldrwl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Tyler, TX
    Posts
    1,693

    Default

    I found that very interesting.
    The police immediately fall back into their routine, let me see your permit, let me see your license, let me see something dammit! The camera man has more courage than I, walking up to a policeman with a gun showing, yikes! Got to give some credit to the policeman, he composed himself and didn't escalate the situation. I got to think a lot of policeman would not let the gun carrier get off without taking him in.
    http://www.denverresearch.com/Charger/Badge%20Sml.jpgGrandpa's Sheriff Badge, Littleton 1920's

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    the Springs
    Posts
    2,581

    Default

    Colorado has a stop and identify law, but North Carolina (where the vid was shot) does not.

    He was completely in the right in his state, in CO he could have been arrested. A guy in NV fought a similar law all the way to the supreme court and lost.

    in the video you see the officer get his phone, and can practically hear the cogs turning as he decides what to do. he eventually realizes the guy is in the right and leaves.

    the police always want to be the only ones around with the guns, because (starship troopers!) that's where their authority ultimately resides. Their fear is not unfounded, as the uniform makes them a target. They have a risky job and really put themselves out there, and want to be as safe as they can.

    But some really dumb shit has been done in the name of officer safety.

    Hopefully both of them do better next time

  9. #19
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    What would he have been arrested for in Colorado? Refusal to identify himself?
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  10. #20
    Grand Master Know It All clublights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    2,517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart View Post
    What would he have been arrested for in Colorado? Refusal to identify himself?
    Basically Yes...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_and_Identify_statutes

    read near the bottom ( before all the citations) about how colorado's is " harsher" then other states and seems to confirm my belief that you have to produce ID on demand .

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •