Close
Results 1 to 10 of 56

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Well, I don't want to get into the abortion issue either way, as I don't think it is an appropriate parallel to guns. I guess that was the point I was making.

    Regardless, it doesn't matter how things are perceived in the battle over abortion, because that has nothing to do with guns and is totally irrelevant. I guess that's what I'm trying to say.

  2. #2
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South Metro
    Posts
    136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart View Post
    Well, I don't want to get into the abortion issue either way, as I don't think it is an appropriate parallel to guns. I guess that was the point I was making.

    Regardless, it doesn't matter how things are perceived in the battle over abortion, because that has nothing to do with guns and is totally irrelevant. I guess that's what I'm trying to say.
    Agree completely, let's not bring abortion into this discussion. It has nothing to do with guns.

  3. #3
    Freeform Funkafied funkfool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    2,846

    Default

    Agreed.
    Yet I stand by my post: MAIG is anti-gun.
    NRA Benefactor Member
    "If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin." Samuel Adams
    Feedback and Disclaimer

  4. #4
    Machine Gunner SAnd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    1,625

    Default No "middle ground"

    Moviestar says "yes there is a middle ground".

    The big problem with the "middle ground" or compromise is assumes that the opposition will honor a compromise. The words incrementalism, progressive and slippery slope come to mind.

    I compromised in 1934 with the National Firearms Act .

    I compromised in 1968 with the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 and the Gun Control Act of 1968.

    I compromised in1986 with the Firearms Owner's Protection Act.

    I compromised in 1993 with the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act.

    I compromised in 1994 with the Assault Weapons Ban which fortunately self repealed in 2004.

    I'm not inclined to compromise and meet someone half way when they come back and want to take more time after time after time. They keep moving the middle ground.

    No more. You want them come and get them.

    From my Cold Dead Hands.
    Steve A.

  5. #5
    Machine Gunner alan0269's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    1,191

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SAnd View Post
    Moviestar says "yes there is a middle ground".

    The big problem with the "middle ground" or compromise is assumes that the opposition will honor a compromise. The words incrementalism, progressive and slippery slope come to mind.

    I compromised in 1934 with the National Firearms Act .

    I compromised in 1968 with the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 and the Gun Control Act of 1968.

    I compromised in1986 with the Firearms Owner's Protection Act.

    I compromised in 1993 with the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act.

    I compromised in 1994 with the Assault Weapons Ban which fortunately self repealed in 2004.

    I'm not inclined to compromise and meet someone half way when they come back and want to take more time after time after time. They keep moving the middle ground.

    No more. You want them come and get them.

    From my Cold Dead Hands.
    Steve A.
    I agree! Any more into the "middle ground", and we will be rolling downhill towards total gun control.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •