Monthly Meet?

[M2MG]

As for a place to meet, who would be for also doing an "Open Carry" at a local Starbucks since they're not supporting the Brady Bunch kooks?

Just no Starbucks in Denver, since Denver doesn't have to play by the law.

M2MG

[KevDen2005]

Starbucks is Pro-Gun?

[M2MG]

Starbucks is Pro-Gun?

Yes, yes they are

http://www.caivn.org/article/2010/03...cks-gun-debate

M2MG

[KevDen2005]

That is awesome, hopefully they never give in to anti-gun pressure!

[Irving]

I'd say they are more pro law than they are pro gun. I'm sure they'd rather NOT have people with guns in their place, but not if they have to come down on people's freedoms to get that.

[iamhunter]

I'd be down for a meet in the springs area. I wonder if anyone is younger than me...


I wouldn't mind hitting up one of the upcoming shoots either, but the 13th is out, I'll be out of town.

[Irving]

I also can't make the 13th shoot this month.

[CoGunNut]

Just another thought:

Why not hold it around the weekend of the Tanner Gun Show? Perhaps the Saturday Evening right after the show closes?

Just a thought.

Nut

[theGinsue]

Yes, yes they are

http://www.caivn.org/article/2010/03...cks-gun-debate

M2MG

I'd say they are more pro law than they are pro gun. I'm sure they'd rather NOT have people with guns in their place, but not if they have to come down on people's freedoms to get that.

Stuart, you beat me to the punch. As I was reading through the thread I was intending to respond that they are more "pro-Rights" and have taken the position that they don't want to get in the middle of this issue. Of course, it'll just take one moron to pull a stunt in a Starbucks (mass killing, etc.) to get them to change their stance.

Their position is surprising given their target demographic tends to be more of the tree hugging / kum-by-ah singing crowd (Not that they don't have plenty of folks like us that frequent the place).

[ChadAmberg]

Stuart, you beat me to the punch. As I was reading through the thread I was intending to respond that they are more "pro-Rights" and have taken the position that they don't want to get in the middle of this issue. Of course, it'll just take one moron to pull a stunt in a Starbucks (mass killing, etc.) to get them to change their stance.

Their position is surprising given their target demographic tends to be more of the tree hugging / kum-by-ah singing crowd (Not that they don't have plenty of folks like us that frequent the place).

We can always hope that this hypothetical situation goes the other way: that a CCW holder saves a bunch of people in a Starbucks from some crazed killer.

But I'm sure the Associated Press will still spin it with "Armed Veteran Kills Undocumented Cash Deposit Taker" or something.