It is interesting because there HAVE been several documented gun crimes on gun free campuses by criminals. They KNOW that this won't change anything as far as gun crime goes. There have been no documented gun accidents involving legal carries that I'm aware of (There has to be some out there, not necessarily lethal though) yet they change the law anyway. Why?

The only explanation I can think of, is that people are afraid of being elected into a position and being considered a "Do nothing elected official" during their term. Personally, I think a "do nothing" politician is the BEST kind, and I understand that they don't see it that way. However, to pick doing something counterproductive to...anything really, just doesn't make sense to me. If this change isn't adding safety and isn't making money, what is the point?