Assuming this letter is real, which I doubt, the author needs to brush up on his civics and history facts.

1) We are not a democracy, dumbass.

2) Seems to me about 240 years ago lots of folks were talking about how farmers and shopkeepers (office workers of the day) didn't stand a chance against the world's strongest, best trained and well equipped army and navy. Ask any royal subject you know how that turned out for 'em.

Matter of fact, the Brits were slow learners back then. They tried again in 1812 with the same results.

I also have news for this guy. Lots of those "lazy civilians" he dismisses have some pretty substantial military or equivalent experience. And they have lots of other life skills needed to survive confrontation.

Wow...he shot a whole 200 rounds at the range!!! What a stud.

I have to say his viewpoint (again, assuming this is real) is not the one I frequently hear from active and reserve military contacts.

Would armed revolution be a walk in the park??? Of course not. But I don't think it would be anything like he's envisioning, either. Grow up, little boy.