Close
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 62
  1. #11
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    That brings up a good question. Just because you are not allowed to purchase through an FFL, does that mean that you are not allowed to own a gun?

  2. #12
    Witness Protection Reject rondog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Parker, CO
    Posts
    8,308
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Since friggin' when does pot do anything for pain?

  3. #13
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Ummm, since forever. Seriously.

  4. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Larimer County
    Posts
    1,580
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    It seems that they are just being prevented from purchasing from a licensed dealer, not from ownership or posession (unless under the influence of the medication).

  5. #15
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    So it doesn't seem like a huge deal if you are only prevented from buying from an FFL. Sure, your options are more limited, but if it is not illegal for you to actually own guns, then it isn't quite as big of a decision to get a card or not.

  6. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Larimer County
    Posts
    1,580
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Don't forget though that posession of a firearm while under the influence is still illegal in Colorado. Even if it is a drug that is prescribed (vicodin, oxy, marijuana, etc..), you are in violation of CRS if you are in posession of a firearm under the influence of that substance.

  7. #17
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    That's a totally moot point IMO. Alcohol is legal and possession of a firearm is illegal while under the influence. Despite what people think, just because someone has a medical marijuana card, doesn't mean that they are high all the time. Plus, good luck proving that someone was high at the time.

  8. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Larimer County
    Posts
    1,580
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Tests can confirm presence of THC up to a week prior to the testing. Blood tests (although only accureate for a few hours) are common for DUI suspicions, could be easily implemented when an officer suspects any drug impairment with posession of a firearm.

  9. #19
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    There are all kinds of tests, including hair sample tests that can reveal drug use for several months past, but proving that someone was under the influence at the time is different. Not as easy as with alcohol. Actually, I thought that was one of the main complaints with officers about legalizing weed, is that they couldn't easily determine how much weed was in some one's system at the time since you can't just blow into a breathalyzer or something.

  10. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Larimer County
    Posts
    1,580
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Blood and silivia tests can confirm usage within the last few hours, perhaps up to a day or more, and indicate a positive within minutes of the drug's usage.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •