Close
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Lifetime Member - R*I*P Friend
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Divide
    Posts
    197

    Default

    The FA is usefull when you want to quietly chamber a round.

  2. #2
    Guest
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    carbondale
    Posts
    223

    Default

    6 pound hunting rifle? only if you pay alot extra can you find one that light. winchester featherweights are 7.25 pounds.

  3. #3
    Machine Gunner ronaldrwl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Tyler, TX
    Posts
    1,693

    Default

    Remington Seven with the shorter barrel 20-inch, and overall weight of under 6 1/2 lbs. I don't know all the weights but my sons DPMS 308 feels like twice my Rem Ultra-Mag.
    http://www.denverresearch.com/Charger/Badge%20Sml.jpgGrandpa's Sheriff Badge, Littleton 1920's

  4. #4
    I am my own action figure
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Wheat Ridge
    Posts
    4,010
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Having actually hunted with just about everything over the years...its depends. I shot 2 deer with my 18" barreled AR-10 (Which is specifically an Armalite) and scoped it was just at 9 pounds. My .338-06 scoped is a Weatherby Ultralight and is 6 1/2 pounds...there is a LOT of difference. I would not hesitate the go with the Remington if that is the one you like, they have excellent customer service.

    Forward assist is COMPLETELY useless on a hunting rifle. The dust cover is not a big deal, but could keep snow and dirt out of the upper. It can be closed with a round chamnbered and flips open when the gun is fired or manually unloaded.
    Good Shooting, MarkCO

    www.CarbonArms.us
    www.crci.org

  5. #5
    Newbie, or Trading Post Troll
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    western Boulder County
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarkCO View Post

    Forward assist is COMPLETELY useless on a hunting rifle. The dust cover is not a big deal, but could keep snow and dirt out of the upper.
    Thanks, that's the kind of info I'm looking for. So far , haven't heard any strong opinions pro or con about the Remington so I'm leaning pretty far in that direction. Gonna decide in the next couple of weeks, probably.

  6. #6
    Machine Gunner Marine24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,245

    Default

    Outpost37,

    No practical experience with the Remington, but I've had a couple of LR-308. One with a 24" barrel that is only suited for hauling from your truck directly to a bench and one with a 16" barrel. With a 3-9x36 compact scope and a full 19 round magazine, the 16" LR-308 comes in at 11lbs 7 oz. Since you are limited to a five round magazine for hunting, the weight will be less but not sure by how much.

    Whether a rifle that heavy is a practical weapon to be used for hunting depends on the style of hunting. If you are in a stand, blind or similar fixed position, I think it is very appropriate. If you are spotting and stalking with the rifle at the ready/high port, it will be tough particularly at altitude.

    Agree with MarkCO on the utility of the forward assist. Has its place on the battlefield, but not necessary in a hunting application.

    Dust cover is a good feature if you use it. Most folks forget to close it (me included), so it doesn't serve the purpose it was designed for but I'm a traditionalist and wouldn't by an AR without one.

    Bottom line is neither are must haves.

  7. #7
    Angels rejoice when BigBears trumpet blows
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    CoS
    Posts
    5,249

    Default

    Bottom line: Get both! <--- Can't believe that hasn't been said yet! lol

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •