Close
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TS12000 View Post
    He could've also just rolled up on them and not seen the gun at first, you just never know. Glad to hear he is doing fine. Also, how would people against this new law use this as ammo for their argument Stuart?
    Who knows what those dummy people think? I was scrolling through channels, stopped when I saw the headline and it went to commercial. I made my post, the show came back and it was CNN, then, right on que the guy says, "This will no doubt fuel the fire for the debate of the recently passed law." Ok CNN guy, whatever you say.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  2. #2
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Glenwood Springs,,CO,,Western slope
    Posts
    582

    Default

    Sadly gone are the days of 2 in a car,patrols.
    Glad that the Deputy is ok.

  3. #3
    Guest
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Charleston SC
    Posts
    1,404

    Default

    Gotcha Stu, I do see now how groups could say "If he hadn't suspected them based on their skin color he never would've been shot" or some dumb shit like that, you know classic blame the victim tactics.

  4. #4
    COAR SpecOps Team Leader theGinsue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Colo Spr
    Posts
    21,974
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart View Post
    I hope the people against this law don't try to use this as evidence why they think this law is bad.
    Quote Originally Posted by TS12000 View Post
    Also, how would people against this new law use this as ammo for their argument Stuart?
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart View Post
    Who knows what those dummy people think? I was scrolling through channels, stopped when I saw the headline and it went to commercial. I made my post, the show came back and it was CNN, then, right on que the guy says, "This will no doubt fuel the fire for the debate of the recently passed law." Ok CNN guy, whatever you say.

    My guess is that they'll use the arguement that if the deputy hadn't been there, if he hadn't been "looking for an encounter" (aka, if he hadn't been attempting to enforce the law), then he wouldn't have been in harms way - and THAT is why the law is bad.

    Hippie logic!
    Ginsue - Admin
    Proud Infidel Since 1965

    "You can't spell genius without Ginsue." -Ray1970, Apr 2020

    Ginsue's Feedback

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •