Well sure it's poisonous, if you drink it.
Well sure it's poisonous, if you drink it.
"There are no finger prints under water."
"The Second Amendment fails to mention hunting. Highly trained police officers miss with roughly 80 percent of their shots in a gunfight. Get a clue. Your Secret Service officers carry (at least) 30 rounds EACH. Is your life more important to you than mine is to me"?
TFOGGER
I'm not a lawyer or a representative of the company, but I'd advise against it.
Hopefully sometime this summer I'll attempt to make that rocket stove and I'll post it up on here.
"There are no finger prints under water."
You are dealing with a chemical compound. The composition prior to burning (an oxidation reduction reaction, resulting in new compounds) is different than after burning. I suspect it's toxic before burning, but the fumes from the flame are not. So, unless you are adding it to flavor the food, you are fine.
As an example, I suspect exhaling and then taking a nice big hit off of a natural gas line is probably really bad for you, but people have been burning natural gas for centuries to cook their food.
Mom's comin' 'round to put it back the way it ought to be.
Anyone that thinks war is good is ignorant. Anyone that thinks war isn't needed is stupid.
"The Second Amendment fails to mention hunting. Highly trained police officers miss with roughly 80 percent of their shots in a gunfight. Get a clue. Your Secret Service officers carry (at least) 30 rounds EACH. Is your life more important to you than mine is to me"?
TFOGGER
"The Second Amendment fails to mention hunting. Highly trained police officers miss with roughly 80 percent of their shots in a gunfight. Get a clue. Your Secret Service officers carry (at least) 30 rounds EACH. Is your life more important to you than mine is to me"?
TFOGGER
I found this video of how to make a rocket stove out of bricks. This stove could use some improvements, but the idea is cool.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSMR2...eature=related
Also, it should be noted that what I've learned from watching all these "rocket stove" videos, is that none of these types of stoves are actual rocket stoves, they are only referred to that way as a layman term. I think a true rocket stove is much more complex.
All that aside, the idea of this type of stove is very cool. Many of you probably already know this, but I didn't and thought it was great to learn. The point of making these stoves with insulation and a chimney is so you can greatly increase the heat at one point. This allows you to use much less wood and still be able to have high enough temperatures to effectively cook food. The insulation keeps the heat in the stove and the chimney directs all the heat out the top where your cook surface is.
"There are no finger prints under water."
So stuart, what is the verdict on the petrolium jelly versus the alcohol test? I am curious.
I haven't tried the petroleum jelly yet, although I do have a new can stove to try it in.
Pouring that 70% alcohol into my first can basically ruined it, because now it seems to be water logged. I guess I could try the petrolium today though. I was kind of under the impression that the jelly wouldn't release enough fumes to ignite. Guess there is only one way to find out though.
Seems like with the petroleum jelly, I won't need a medium (cotton balls) to hold the propellant up close to the holes or keep it in place. I'll try it with just jelly and no cotton balls unless anyone says something different in the next few minutes here.
Last edited by Irving; 06-13-2010 at 20:38.
"There are no finger prints under water."