Close
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19
  1. #11

  2. #12
    COAR SpecOps Team Leader theGinsue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Colo Spr
    Posts
    21,838
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Damned lying, thieving, sons-a-........
    Ginsue - Admin
    Proud Infidel Since 1965

    "You can't spell genius without Ginsue." -Ray1970, Apr 2020

    Ginsue's Feedback

  3. #13
    Guest
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Conifer
    Posts
    902

    Default

    We'll one day not care so much. Just ask the Indians....

  4. #14
    Gong Shooter OgenRwot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    123
    Posts
    474

    Default

    The problem for us is that nobody outside of Colorado cares about this bill. Their constituencies don't give two shits about open land in Colorado so they can vote for it without retribution. What does that mean? Even if everybody here, including Polis, vote against the bill it will still pass with flying colors and we'll be SOL and locked out of our mountains.

  5. #15
    Guest
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Woodland Park
    Posts
    497

    Default

    I've been hearing about this for some time, thanks for the details. Yes, it is unlawful and not American for the Feds to own 1/3 of our land. I wish the western states had more foresight like Arkansas. Back when the Feds were establishing all the first parks and monuments, they turned all their potential sights into state parks, effectively blocking the Feds. My family and I are National Park junkies. There are to many parks with way more land then is necessary. Not to mention the amount completely uninteresting places.
    FARGING BASTEGES!

  6. #16
    Paper Hunter ERNO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Baltimore, Maryland
    Posts
    274

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OgenRwot View Post
    The problem for us is that nobody outside of Colorado cares about this bill. Their constituencies don't give two shits about open land in Colorado so they can vote for it without retribution. What does that mean? Even if everybody here, including Polis, vote against the bill it will still pass with flying colors and we'll be SOL and locked out of our mountains.
    I don't live in Colorado, I live in Maryland; but if the land grab is meant to stop the land rapist's oil shale, gas coal mining and drilling rights; I'm all for it.
    Here, over on the eastern seaboard, the mountain-top mining occuring in West Virgina is turning out to be a enviromental catastrophe. Which entails removal of whole mountain tops to get at the coal seam; meanwhile dumping the residue at the bottom of the mountain's below, where the streams are.
    Obama is trying to stop the process; but the banks are one of the best ways to stop the land rapists, by denying the financing to run there earth destroying projects.

  7. #17
    Machine Gunner BadShot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Centennial
    Posts
    1,614

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ERNO View Post
    I don't live in Colorado, I live in Maryland; but if the land grab is meant to stop the land rapist's oil shale, gas coal mining and drilling rights; I'm all for it.
    Here, over on the eastern seaboard, the mountain-top mining occuring in West Virgina is turning out to be a enviromental catastrophe. Which entails removal of whole mountain tops to get at the coal seam; meanwhile dumping the residue at the bottom of the mountain's below, where the streams are.
    Obama is trying to stop the process; but the banks are one of the best ways to stop the land rapists, by denying the financing to run there earth destroying projects.
    Actually that very much depends on which Bureau ends up with which portions of the land. I haven't read the bill so I'm not sure what the division of land is going to be. Most likely Bureau of Land Management (largest holder of .gov lands west of the Mississippi) with mineral and resource oversight by the artist formerly known as Mineral Management Service (MMS). National Park Service, perhaps a little bit thrown at US Fish and Wildlife.. would make sense.

    The former MMS (can't remember the new name, there are three of them now) component generally has responsibility for just about all mining, drilling and such. Well at least the leasing, and over sight (snicker, snicker)

    All said and told, it really isn't right to snag that much land, but if the states don't stand up, then the Fed is going to tap dance all over them, like it or not.

  8. #18
    Gong Shooter OgenRwot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    123
    Posts
    474

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ERNO View Post
    I don't live in Colorado, I live in Maryland;
    Well then you can A: Shut the hell up
    or B: come over here and look at the minuscule footprint the rigs have and when they are gone you can barely tell there was a rig there in the first place. And then you can shut the hell up.

    By the way, you're a typical liberal. You obviously don't work because you have time to troll a small firearms board half a country away. Get a job and stop relying on the rest of us to pay your government check.

  9. #19
    Varmiteer jake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Broomfield
    Posts
    536

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OgenRwot View Post

    By the way, you're a typical liberal. You obviously don't work because you have time to troll a small firearms board half a country away. Get a job and stop relying on the rest of us to pay your government check.
    Nice troll of the troll

    "A lot of people seem obliged to have a viewpoint."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •