Make Colorado a FREE STATE!

[ooghost1oo]

From the Facebook Group:
Make Colorado a FREE STATE! - Vote Dan Maes for Governor
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=120921514621244

-------------------------------------------------

Don't care about Politics?
Well, you should.
Politics care about you.

Colorado is in a unique swing status right now, where we could either sway into becoming a nanny-state under federal control (like New York or California), or dig into our roots and become a FREE STATE.

This isn't about Republican, Democrat, Independent--whatever.

One of the greatest tricks the tyrants ever did was to distract us with division by parties. When the Left does something terrible and crushing to freedom, the people who identify themselves with the Left say, "well, YOUR president BUSH did THIS and THAT!" instead of looking at the bigger picture and real threat to Liberty.

-----

Right now we have three main people fighting for the governor's seat:

John Hickenlooper
Scott McInnis
and Dan Maes

Hickenlooper is nothing more than the successor to Bill Ritter, an incompetent big-government tyrant-supporter who will be a rubber stamp for Obama and his tyrannical agenda, someone who doesn't believe in Federalism (independent states making their own laws) and will raise your taxes, try to take away your rights (free speech and the right to defend yourself), and submit to whatever plot the Leftists in Washington DC decree. He is Colorado's Obama. But then again, if you understand why Obama is such a poison to freedom, you won't be voting for Hickenlooper anyway, will you?

Scott McInnis claims to be the 'Conservative' candidate, but is the lesser man and is NOT the freedom-minded activist he's trying to make himself out to be. He's a career politician, and he's riding on the wave of the peoples' current political atmosphere, like politicians do. He's never responeded to my letters or my questions (as Dan Maes did), because he doesn't care about us and is out of touch with the people. Whatever sort of Republican he may be, he's not the true Conservative. And his recent scandal only reinforces the typical politician BS.

Dan Maes is the peoples' candidate. A true Conservative and a business man with the experience to 'manage' Colorado and its budget with 20 years small business experience that McInnis does not have. I saw him speak at a Tea Party Rally, and he's the real deal. We've conversed via email. He has built his popularity by traveling around Colorado and meeting its people.

-----

Gun rights are my particular fight, and in my emails with Dan Maes he told me:

- He would support a 'Constitutional Carry', Vermont/Alaska/Arizona style (concealed carry without a permit for law-abiding citizens), because he supports out right to carry unharrassed.
- He would revoke all the extra BS anti-gun restrictions of Denver County

He's also said that he will enact laws to protect us from illegal immigrants (similar to Arizona), and would take the axe to the bloated state budget.

-----

Vote in your primaries (August 10th), and support Dan Maes. Scott McInnis is a weak candidate, and is not the man we need to turn Colorado's path back toward freedom and the Constitution. And we must defeat Hickenlooper at all costs.

McInnis and Hickenlooper are politicians with a lot of money. Hickenlooper has MILLIONS, since he's being groomed by Obama. Dan Maes is just a grassroots Conservative with a whole lot less resources to work with, so he relies on Coloradans to spread the word and help the cause of freedom.

So get involved. DEFEND LIBERTY BEFORE IT'S LOST! If you're 'not involved' with politics, then GET IN, because we're at a critical time, never before in American history, where your freedoms that you take for granted and have known all your life may be TAKEN AWAY.

If you're Republican, vote in the Primaries for Dan Maes. If you're an Independent, go with the governor that will make Colorado stand on its own, lower taxes, and support the Constitution, our Country's LAW and IDEALS. If you're a Democrat, and you're finally learning what a mistake it was to vote a Communist into the Whitehouse, change over to Republican (it's a NEW Republican party--it's about Freedom and Liberty, not about *Bush*) and support Dan Maes in the Primaries and the main election.

Help make Colorado a FREE STATE. Vote Dan Maes.

__________________________________________________ __

Make Colorado a FREE STATE:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=120921514621244

"Open Carry" Supporters of Colorado:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=212878675303

[Ranger]

+100

[OgenRwot]

How does voting for a guy that can't beat Hickenlooper make Colorado any more free? Seems like it's a vote in the opposite direction if you ask me.

[ronaldrwl]

The time for compromising is over. Vote for the best person. I'm putting up a Dan Maes sign in my yard.

[XJ]

I keep hearing that Mays can't getrdone, but nobody ever explains why?

Looper is going to get the lockstep vote of certain segments of our population, that is a given for someone with his party affiliation and there isn't anything that crackers like me can do about it.

After writing those folks off, how does McCopy-n-paste do better than a warm body with R next to his name?

[esaabye]

I don't know if Dan can do it and not sure if I care, I have to vote the man and not the party.

Problem I have is Dan has some issues of his own.

Based on the small amount of info he has allowed out about his tax returns it does not seem to me he is a particularlly good business man. I have heard him speak about why he did not want to share the info and it does not ring true to me.

Add the funding violations which he has explained but has not shown the paperwork to back it up.

I had high hopes but not sure I have a vote to cast in this primary at this point.

Bring me Tancredo as an Indepandant or Libritarian and then we can talk.

I don't want a liberal but am sick of voting for the lesser of the evils.

[jim02]

How does voting for a guy that can't beat Hickenlooper make Colorado any more free? Seems like it's a vote in the opposite direction if you ask me.

Thats what the repiblican party wants you to think, same thing both the dems and reps made people believe about Ross Perot.
The Colorado republican party is a shit pile and has once again proven they can only put out horrible canidates, this is because they put canidates up by the "its your turn now" method of endorsing canidates.
Dan has made it to the primary because "We The People" have brought him here and "We the People" can win any election if we can stop lisitening to the parties and vote for whom we want and not whom they give us.

I am behind Dan, not because I think hes as clean as a whistle but because I think he will work for us and I know Scott will not.
Scott has served us before and look at all the great stuff he did, yeah I dont see it either. But he did name a mountain range after his family, wow great work Scott

[BadShot]

So Tancredo is not a 2nd Amendment supporter eh?

http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Tom_...un_Control.htm

Sorry, he's getting my vote, none of the other fucktards are even close to him.

[jim02]

So Tancredo is not a 2nd Amendment supporter eh?

http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Tom_...un_Control.htm

Sorry, he's getting my vote, none of the other fucktards are even close to him.

He's not in the race yet, he has to find a party to run for still. Let him get on the ballot first, then we can vote for him.

[Bailey Guns]

So Tancredo is not a 2nd Amendment supporter eh?

That's correct. He is better than some, but not nearly as good as others, despite what he may say. But no need to take my word for it. Here it is in his own words:


From the Rocky Mountain News, Jan 31, 2000:

Tancredo, who faces a potentially tough challenge in his re-election bid, said he is not dismissing the volatile issue of gun control. The freshman lawmaker was the only member of the state's six-member House delegation to vote for a package of compromise gun-safety measures that ultimately was defeated. The pro-gun faction thought the package did too much, and gun-control advocates thought it did too little.

``That bill would have closed loopholes at gun shows, and it would have banned high-capacity clips,''Tancredo said. ``No person who, as a juvenile had committed any crime, could have been sold a gun under that law. And it made possession of an assault weapon by a juvenile a federal crime. ``I defy anyone to describe those things individually and call them watered-down, or pro-gun, or NRA-sponsored,'' Tancredo added. All four Republican members of the House delegation have received financial support from gun-rights groups - but none more than Tancredo. In his first election in 1998, Tancredo received $10,400 from gun-rights groups. Schaffer took in $7,000, Hefley $5,000 and Rep. Scott McInnis $3,000. Underscoring the sensitive nature of the issue, Tancredo vowed last month not to accept any contributions from gun-rights groups for his re-election campaign.

Compromise "gun safety" measures? Gun show loophole? Ban high-capacity "clips"? No person who had committed any crime as juvenile can buy a gun?

Even the NRA could only muster a B+ rating for him.

Sure, Tom. You're a staunch 2A supporter. Got it.