I think everyone has a fascination with taxes, but the real problem is that spending has become unlinked from taxes. Since 2003 the fed deficit has grown by 500BN a year. 1.0T in 2008. 1.9T in 2009. So the money has been spent, and eventually we'll have to pay the bill on that. I expect Obama will allow the Bush tax cuts to lapse, essentially raising on taxes on anyone making more than 250k by like 3%.
As for appeasing the debtors, well, there are many millions of them and individually they aren't very "important". What does matter is the perceived value of the dollar. If we continue to print money, we reduce the value of the USD. This is inflation. The upshot to inflation is it makes it easier for the country to pay off it's debts. This would upset anyone who holds Tbills because what they are paid in return might be less than they spent, in inflation adjusted terms. Part of the UST's solution is to offer inflation adjusted notes, that go on the consume price index.
My point is this: If you don't like taxes, then you need to oppose spending. All of the spending. Including the sacrosanct 600B+ U.S. Military. All of the entitlement programs. All discretionary funding.
People claim Democrats are Tax and Spend; frankly I prefer that to what we saw in the latter half of the Bush Administration, which was Borrow and Spend.
Ron Paul 2012
H.
PS: Communist states? I don't think there are any. Just despots, (DPRK), tyrants (Cuba), and bureaucrats (PRC) who masquerade as Communists, but really are just working to enrich the lives of their leaders without pissing off the populace enough for them to revolt.
PPS: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikiped...(United_States) Reading this, you see that 2.3T of US Debt is owned by the Social Security Administration. The US fed has been borrowing money from the collective piggy bank almost since it was established.