Close
Results 1 to 10 of 65

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #36
    Grand Master Know It All 68Charger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Canton, TX
    Posts
    3,721

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bailey Guns View Post
    You're right...it is basically the same as not voting. You're wrong by saying in either case it's not "giving a vote to Hick" and "you're bad at math".

    Here's the example:

    You have a voting pool of 100 people. Your candidates are Hickenlooper, Tancredo and Republican candidate.

    After the election, with many people pissed at the "R" candidate, here's what you have:
    Hick - 45 votes
    Republican - 39 votes
    Tancredo - 16 votes
    I'll be generous and say that only 75% of the Tancredo voters would have otherwise voted for the Republican candidate (I seriously doubt many liberals are going to vote for Tancredo, no matter how pissed they are at the democrat party). If you split that vote 75% for the Republican and 25% for Hickenlooper, here's what you have:
    Republican - 51 votes
    Hick - 49 votes
    You also have a governor who will most likely be closer to your beliefs than the other guy.

    It's not bad math. It's reality.
    sometimes bad math is reality :-P
    you've actually proved my point- or do you prefer to say it's bad English to say "the SAME as a vote for Hick"?

    it's an idiom, but it's not fact.. in your example, at best a vote for Tancredo would be 3/4 of a vote for Hick.. you may think I'm splitting hairs...

    Believe me, I understand the logic- and in past & current political climates, it applies... but the current political climate is leading us to ruin.. something radical has to change...

    I'm not a Tancredo supporter, either- saw him on Fox news... wasn't impressed with how unprepared he was.

    but the choices in the GOP primary:
    McInnis: he's a former congressman (strike one), a lawyer (I'll call that a draw), admitted to plagiarism (strike two), and tried to weasel out of it by blaming a researcher (strike three)

    Maes: I'd like to believe he'd be a good governor, but I'm not sure he can keep his hand out of the cookie jar, and his resume is a bit light for a Gubernatorial candidate (no, I don't want a career politician, but it lacks detail, and simply doesn't seem like he has enough experience leading to convince me he can be a good Governor).

    I'm all around disappointed with the choices- seems to be a recurring theme in politics lately
    Last edited by 68Charger; 08-03-2010 at 09:43.
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ, we are the III%, CIP2, and some other catchphrase meant to aggravate progreSSives who are hell bent on taking rights away...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •