Close
Results 1 to 10 of 136

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    This is what I get from your post Ginsue.

    1) You don't think it's right for people to ride motorcycles.
    2) Being gay is the same as having sex with animals.
    3) The second part completely negates your position on the first part.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  2. #2
    COAR SpecOps Team Leader theGinsue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Colo Spr
    Posts
    21,951
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    The farm animal point just shows the hypocrisy of the pro-gay position. They want to remove the lines of what is considered okay, but still hold other things off-limits? Using their common rebuttal: "thats just bigoted".

    When you blur the lines of what is acceptable, where do you stop? If you say that something should now be considered acceptable, but not this other thing, how is that any more right than what you stand against?

    As far as the "You don't think it's right for people to ride motorcycles." crack - I get that you were going for humor, but.. My point is that a car and a motorcycle are not the same - just as heterosexual and homosexual unions are not the same and they shouldn't be classed the same. As far as whether I think either one is "right", I am not declaring right or wrong for either. In fact, I personally believe that marriage is the surest way to screw up a perfectly good relationship.
    Ginsue - Admin
    Proud Infidel Since 1965

    "You can't spell genius without Ginsue." -Ray1970, Apr 2020

    Ginsue's Feedback

  3. #3
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I was trying to point out that you used a comparison of different but equal in the first part, but then switch to different but lower in the second part. <3
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  4. #4
    Fallen Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Smyrna, GA
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by theGinsue View Post
    The farm animal point just shows the hypocrisy of the pro-gay position. They want to remove the lines of what is considered okay, but still hold other things off-limits? Using their common rebuttal: "thats just bigoted".

    When you blur the lines of what is acceptable, where do you stop? If you say that something should now be considered acceptable, but not this other thing, how is that any more right than what you stand against?

    As far as the "You don't think it's right for people to ride motorcycles." crack - I get that you were going for humor, but.. My point is that a car and a motorcycle are not the same - just as heterosexual and homosexual unions are not the same and they shouldn't be classed the same. As far as whether I think either one is "right", I am not declaring right or wrong for either. In fact, I personally believe that marriage is the surest way to screw up a perfectly good relationship.
    Well if you are going to say that Homosexual and Heterosexual Marriages arent the same whats to prevent the line from being moved even further to say that All white marriages aren't the same as Interracial Marriages? That "Slippery slope" argument made about Bestiality and Pedophilia following can be made the other way. Or How about Inter-faith Marriages... Because you Know, in the Bible it says:
    "Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? (2 Corinthians 6:14)."

    I mean Pagans/Jews and Christians married together!?!, its BLASPHEMY!
    Lets outlaw interfaith Marriage too then and anull all existing Interfaith Marriages, Because the book of the invisible man in the sky says so! /sarcasm


    Personally, I believe the line is clearly and distinctly drawn at "Whomever one or more consenting adults wish to Choose as their partners in life is no ones business but their own so long as everyone involved is a consenting adult."

    If a Gay White Jewish Guy wants to Marry a Bi-Hispanic Catholic that is already Married to a straight Asian Buddhist Woman and none of them Cares, whose business is it to say its "Wrong"?
    The Jewish Guy just becomes wife #2.
    Simple.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •