I've been thinking of adding a small pocket revolver to the family, maybe my wife will end up carrying it at some point. I've been thinking of both the Ruger LCR and just recently started looking at the S&W 442 and 642. I've always loved Ruger revolvers and the LCR seems like a well refined little BUG. However, I just recently started looking at the S&W's and the metal construction makes me feel warmer and fuzzier than the polymer. I have polymer pistols and I know they're just fine, the part of my head that wants this pistol to last forever is still thinking metal may be better. With the new Smith rebate on J frames both options are within $25 of each other.
Does anyone have experience with both? What would you all do?



Reply With Quote
half the cost of the smith, value I believe will hold. I love my LCR. As ChadAmberg said, had mine a year or so now, works great every time I go shoot it. Light to carry, love the trigger. No problems so far.



