Close
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Gong Shooter
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    646

    Default Ruger LCR or S&W 442? Experience?

    I've been thinking of adding a small pocket revolver to the family, maybe my wife will end up carrying it at some point. I've been thinking of both the Ruger LCR and just recently started looking at the S&W 442 and 642. I've always loved Ruger revolvers and the LCR seems like a well refined little BUG. However, I just recently started looking at the S&W's and the metal construction makes me feel warmer and fuzzier than the polymer. I have polymer pistols and I know they're just fine, the part of my head that wants this pistol to last forever is still thinking metal may be better. With the new Smith rebate on J frames both options are within $25 of each other.
    Does anyone have experience with both? What would you all do?

  2. #2
    Smeghead - ACE Rimmer ChadAmberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    1,862

    Default

    Buy one of each, you have 2 pockets right?

    Errr.. I mean.. I've had the LCR for a year now. Shoot it regularly enough to stay decent with it, and the polymer does help with recoil. I have an IWB but really prefer the pocket holster I got, really makes it easy to carry. I don't think you could go wrong with it.

  3. #3
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,967

    Default

    Smith all the way-(sorry Ruger fans)
    The Smith will hold its value much better.....
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

  4. #4
    My Fancy Title gnihcraes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    CastleRock/Lakewood
    Posts
    4,426

    Default

    Ruger LCR (sorry Smith fans)... half the cost of the smith, value I believe will hold. I love my LCR. As ChadAmberg said, had mine a year or so now, works great every time I go shoot it. Light to carry, love the trigger. No problems so far.

  5. #5
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,967

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gnihcraes View Post
    Ruger LCR (sorry Smith fans)... half the cost of the smith, value I believe will hold. I love my LCR. As ChadAmberg said, had mine a year or so now, works great every time I go shoot it. Light to carry, love the trigger. No problems so far.
    Back to the "2 pocket" scenario



    "I have two guns....one for each of ya..."
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

  6. #6
    Gong Shooter
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BPTactical View Post
    "I have two guns....one for each of ya..."
    Brilliant, AWESOME movie!

    "Smells like somebody died.."

    I keep hearing about the trigger on the LCR being better and the Smith's resale being better. I'm gonna have to get my wife some range time to see which she likes better- or just show her that you can get pink grips for the Smith.

    Thanks for the advice all, if you think of anything else let me know!

  7. #7
    My Fancy Title gnihcraes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    CastleRock/Lakewood
    Posts
    4,426

    Default

    I just could never justify the $700 smith J frames... (or thereabouts in price) sure there are less costly ones available.

  8. #8
    Gong Shooter
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gnihcraes View Post
    I just could never justify the $700 smith J frames... (or thereabouts in price) sure there are less costly ones available.
    Yeah, I can't justify that either. The 442 is aluminum framed with a stainless cylinder and weighs only 1.5 ounces more than the scandium/uber expensive ones. I can also get it for $420 after transfer, before the $50 rebate, so it'd only be a $370 gun. That's a touch less(!) than the Ruger.
    Last edited by nogaroheli; 08-09-2010 at 21:33.

  9. #9
    My Fancy Title gnihcraes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    CastleRock/Lakewood
    Posts
    4,426

    Default

    wow, decent deal then.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •