It's just your story vs. her story. Usually, your insurance company will stand behind you in cases where both stories are possible/likely, but there are no hard facts to dispute either one.
Only if your story sounds really fishy, will they not fully support you. In my ex-professional opinion, your story doesn't sound hokey, but be prepared to have your company tell you that you failed to make sure the intersection was clear before you proceeded to turn. They'll probably tell you that if you were cutting it so close that just slowing down got you into an accident, that you shouldn't have been turning.
Also, I think that the company that I worked for trained us pretty well as far as being ethical, but not all adjusters are claimed that way. Some companies train their adjusters to ALWAYS find a way to put some sort of comparative negligence on the other driver. I've heard stories of adjusters assigning people 5% fault in an accident where they were stopped at a red light and rear-ended; giving the reason that if you weren't stopped there, no body could have hit you. It's total bullshit, but is a reality. Fortunately, I never came across any cases first hand where that happened, so I wouldn't worry about it too much.





Reply With Quote

